Re: "Dump larger than tape" problem
2003-09-17 11:16:52
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 10:41:28AM -0400, KEVIN ZEMBOWER wrote:
> I'm struggling to solve a "dump larger than tape" problem, and not making
> much progress. I'm
> asking for suggestions and troubleshooting techniques.
>
> I'm trying to back up the Samba share admin//db/f$. I've broken it up into
> two sections:
> amanda@admin:~ > amadmin DailySet1 disklist admin //db/f$/
> line 82:
> host admin:
> interface default
> disk //db/f$:
> program "GNUTAR"
> exclude file "./inetsrv/webpub/images/"
> priority 1
> dumpcycle 3
> maxdumps 1
> maxpromoteday 10000
> strategy STANDARD
> compress NONE
> auth BSD
> kencrypt NO
> holdingdisk YES
> record YES
> index NO
> skip-incr NO
> skip-full NO
>
> line 83:
> host admin:
> interface default
> disk //db/f$/inetsrv/webpub/images:
> program "GNUTAR"
> priority 1
> dumpcycle 3
> maxdumps 1
> maxpromoteday 10000
> strategy STANDARD
> compress NONE
> auth BSD
> kencrypt NO
> holdingdisk YES
> record YES
> index NO
> skip-incr NO
> skip-full NO
>
> amanda@admin:~ >
< all sorts of good stuff snipped >
>
> It's like amanda is not taking into account the excluded directories when
> making the size estimate,
> and then giving up on the level 0 backup because it seems too big.
>
< more snipping >
I have had similar problems, and what i've found is that the smallest
unit that amanda will back up through samba is a *share*, and specifying
individual directories ("disk //server/share/dir1") is fruitless.
Can someone confirm this? Is this a limitation of Samba, or Amanda?
--
eric a. Farris http://eafarris.al.umces.edu/
Systems Administrator
UMCES Appalachian Laboratory http://www.al.umces.edu/
|
|
|