Re: FYI: tapetype program output for AIT-2 (Sony SDX-500C), and questions regarding same
2003-05-21 07:47:14
> Greetings. I have a Sony SDX-500C AIT-2 tape drive (50 GB native). I
> have been using the following entry for my tapetype, obtained from
> various places in the mailing list (I have no idea how this was
> originally generated):
>
> # old - mailing list
> define tapetype AIT-2 {
> comment "SDX-500C"
> length 54538 mbytes
> filemark 1541 kbytes
> speed 2920 kps
> }
>
> Its worked fine, but I haven't been pushing the capacity of the tapes
> (only writing about 40GB or so). That's changing, however, and I'm
> concerned that the length might be too long, so I finally got around to
> (a) turning off hardware compression on the drive (DIP switch number 7
> is OFF), and (b) running the tapetype program on the drive. Here's
> what it came up with (I edited the comment):
>
> # new - obtained from the tapetype program
> define tapetype AIT-2 {
> comment "SDX-500C - produced by the tapetype program - hw compression off"
> length 48898 mbytes
> filemark 2788 kbytes
> speed 6074 kps
> }
>
> My comments/questions:
>
> 3) Neither 54538 mbytes nor 48898 mbytes corresponds to 50 GB, no
> matter how I do the math (i.e. no product of 50, 1000s and 1024s
> generates either of these numbers, and 54538/50 = 1090.76 MB/GB,
> 48898/50 = 977.96 MB/GB). I'm (obviously..?) more inclined to
> believe the smaller number, given the ways of marketing, but does
> anyone have a quick explanation of how tapetype calculates this
> number..?
Jon LaBadie has already mentioned how tapetype calculates its number.
As to the discrepancy between tapetype's number (48898) and the
advertised size of the tape, I do not think that there is much of a
discrepancy. Actually, tapetype is coming up with a slightly larger
number than advertised. Don't forget that amanda does everything in
power-of-two kb (1024) & mb (1048576) while disk and tape
manufacturers advertise in power-of-ten numbers.
48898 * 1048576 = 51273269248, which is 1273269248 bytes larger than
the advertised 50000000000 bytes. Don't worry, be happy!
andrew
|
|
|