On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 11:29:38AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 11:16:19AM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 10:59:48AM -0400, Jean-Louis Martineau wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 12:46:11PM +0400, vlad f halilow wrote:
> > > > hello, i change the request() function in chg-manual for requesting
> > > > tape via
> > > > our monitoring system. but one thing: in the amanda dump report, i look
> > > > the
> > > > string for the next tape to be inserted (awaiting tape). which variable
> > > > or
> > > > file contain string for the next tape? so tape request note looks like
> > > > following:
> > > >
> > > > 'insert new tape'
> > > > 'insert tapename10' etc...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > how i can made this?
> > >
> > > You can use the output of 'amadmin <conf> tape'
> >
> > The output of this command prints the following for my configuration:
> >
> > $ amadmin DS1 tape
> > The next Amanda run should go onto tape DS1-05 or a new tape.
> > The next Amanda run should go onto tape DS1-06 or a new tape.
> >
> > Currently no amdump/amflush is running, so this is what tapes are
> > required for the next run. If my 'runtapes' setting was 5 instead
> > of 2 I presume there would be 5 lines of output.
> >
> > Would the output during an amdump run be different so one could tell
> > which tape is the next one needed?
>
> This command should always list the next n tapes to use, the first line
> give the next one.
Thanks Jean-Louis. Vlad should be able to use that in his modification
of chg-manual.
--
Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
JG Computing
4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
|