Ok! thanks, Christoph (and Toomas again), but ... does it exist any solution in 
these cases? or  must I have to be satisfied and try a "post-backup" (manually 
or not) of these files ?

thanks again,



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christoph Scheeder" <christoph.scheeder AT scheeder DOT de>
To: "Raúl Wild-Spain" <rcruz AT wild-spain DOT com>
Cc: <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM
Subject: Re: Q: finally!!! my first backup ... but :-)


> Hi,
> Your guess is correct,
> this messages are the result of an active filesystem.
> The backup itself is ok, but these specific files will
> probably be bad, as they have been modifyd while tar was reading them.
> Christoph
> 
> Raúl Wild-Spain schrieb:
> > Finally! yesterday I did my first backup and it seems ok, but I've some 
> > doubts about various messages:
> > 
> > FAILURE AND STRANGE DUMP SUMMARY:
> >   xaloc      /dev/sdc2 lev 0 STRANGE
> > 
> > ....
> > 
> > FAILED AND STRANGE DUMP DETAILS:
> > 
> > /-- xaloc      /dev/sdc2 lev 0 STRANGE
> > sendbackup: start [xaloc:/dev/sdc2 level 0]
> > sendbackup: info BACKUP=/bin/tar
> > sendbackup: info RECOVER_CMD=/bin/gzip -dc |/bin/tar -f... -
> > sendbackup: info COMPRESS_SUFFIX=.gz
> > sendbackup: info end
> > ? gtar: ./notesdata/mail/sdelamoc.nsf: file changed as we read it
> > ? gtar: ./notesdata/mail/spaxtonl.nsf: file changed as we read it
> > ? gtar: ./notesdata/mail/xguardio.nsf: file changed as we read it
> > | Total bytes written: 4793784320 (4.5GB, 3.3MB/s)
> > sendbackup: size 4681430
> > sendbackup: end
> > \--------
> > 
> > I've looked at the index files of  _dev_sdc2 and the list seems to be ok. 
> > Then I suppose the mentioned users was connected ( from home) when amanda 
> > did the backup (0:45). It seems, true? 
> > 
> > No problem with the rest of filesystems ( or it seems ).
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > 
> > Raúl
> > rcruz AT wild-spain DOT com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>