ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Command Routing Gotcha in v7.1.8

2018-02-23 00:19:21
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Command Routing Gotcha in v7.1.8
From: "Harris, Steven" <steven.harris AT BTFINANCIALGROUP DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 05:16:26 +0000
So what we need is a server option

SESSIONSECFORCE   TRANSITIONAL

Only able to be set by editing dsmserv.opt and defaulting to NO.   If its set 
then the automatic update to SESSIONSECURITY strict  is not permitted.

Update everything you need to then turn the option off.

I understand why session security has been forced on and I understand that we 
don't want it to be easily bypassed from any admin session as that leaves a 
simple back door, but seriously, someone did not think through the implications.

Cheers

Steve

Steven Harris
TSM Admin/Consultant

Canberra Australia

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Deschner, Roger Douglas
Sent: Friday, 23 February 2018 1:11 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Command Routing Gotcha in v7.1.8

There is a known and somewhat documented restriction where an administrative ID 
which connects to a New (7.1.8 or 8.1.2+) server from a New dsmadmc client, 
cannot connect from an Old administrative client anymore, because 
SESSIONSECURITY has been switched to STRICT.

I have now discovered that this affects Command Routing among servers. It makes 
sense, if you think about it, but it bit me. My test setup has two servers, one 
running 6.3.5 and the other 7.1.8. They both have Admin ID roger with the same 
password. Command routing initially worked fine between the two servers using 
Admin ID roger. But then Admin ID roger used a 7.1.8 client dsmadmc to connect 
to the 7.1.8 server, and all that SSL magic happened and SESSIONSECURITY got 
changed to STRICT. As documented, now Admin ID roger cannot use an older client 
dsmadmc to reach the 7.1.8 server. Although roger can still connect to the 
6.3.5 server using any version client dsmadmc, now command routing no longer 
works. It fails with "ANR0454E Session rejected by server ADSM-3, reason: 7 - 
Down level." It does work when Admin ID roger connects to the 7.1.8 server. UPD 
ADMIN ROGER SESSIONSECURITY=TRANSITIONAL is a bypass, and I'm keeping the 
(ugly) suggestion in mind to issue it every 5 minutes from a schedule if this 
becomes an issue.

I have noticed that, if SESSIONSECURITY=TRANSITIONAL is in effect, and you use 
an Old client to connect to an Old server, and you use command routing to route 
a command to a New server, it does NOT change SESSIONSECURITY to STRICT for 
that Admin ID on the New server. That is good. This feature of automatically 
setting SESSIONSECURITY to STRICT on Admin IDs is turning into one of our worst 
stumbling blocks in this major update. I'm the administrator; don't mess with 
my own ID!

This looks like another reason to upgrade ALL servers to 7.1.8/8.1.2+ before 
upgrading ANY clients. We have several admin IDs that are used by a variety of 
cron processes to monitor and control the backup systems. Some of these 
processes use command routing. I am now inventorying them, because the clients 
they connect from must all be upgraded together at the same time to avoid 
failures of these monitoring and control processes.

Roger Deschner
University of Illinois at Chicago
"I have not lost my mind; it is backed up on tape somewhere."

This message and any attachment is confidential and may be privileged or 
otherwise protected from disclosure. You should immediately delete the message 
if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this email by 
mistake please delete it from your system; you should not copy the message or 
disclose its content to anyone. 

This electronic communication may contain general financial product advice but 
should not be relied upon or construed as a recommendation of any financial 
product. The information has been prepared without taking into account your 
objectives, financial situation or needs. You should consider the Product 
Disclosure Statement relating to the financial product and consult your 
financial adviser before making a decision about whether to acquire, hold or 
dispose of a financial product. 

For further details on the financial product please go to http://www.bt.com.au 

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC