ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] empty containers?

2018-02-21 10:08:47
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] empty containers?
From: PAC Brion Arnaud <Arnaud.Brion AT PANALPINA DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:03:41 +0000
Hi Remco,

No direct answer to your question, but your statement " dedup on SQL is 
non-existant" is kind of astonishing me ...

Here an extract of the output for "q stg DIR_SQL f=d" on my server (you guessed 
it, this stgpool is dedicated to SQL backups ...) :

                Deduplication Savings: 34,513 G (60.21%)
                   Compression Savings: 17,517 G (76.81%)
                     Total Space Saved: 52,030 G (90.77%)

Altogether 90,7 % data reduction !

I would be curious to hear what our TSM fellows in this list are achieving ...

Cheers.

Arnaud


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Remco Post
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 3:06 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: empty containers?

Hi All,

today I ran into something new: an empty directory container. No, not an empty 
directory, and empty container. We’re moving SQL backups from directories to 
traditional tape, dedup on SQL is non-existant, so tape is cheaper, and after 
the expiration period the container pool should be empty. Well this being the 
real world and all, of course I have a few containers left. Move container bla 
bla to reduce disk usage. All nice, exceprt for some containers that are now 
empty, thus can’t be moved… How do I get rid of those? TSM server level 
8.1.1.100

-- 

 Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind Regards,

Remco Post
r.post AT plcs DOT nl
+31 6 248 21 622
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC