Re: [ADSM-L] Trying again
2018-02-14 01:43:53
Hi Steve,
I think that snapdiff is only usefull when there's a large number of files in
the share, avoiding to have to do a full scan of the share to determine the
candidates.
Why are you using snapdiff in your case ? Have you tried the basic progressive
incremental way ?
--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON
----- Mail original -----
De: "Steve Schaub" <Steve_Schaub AT BCBST DOT COM>
À: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Envoyé: Lundi 12 Février 2018 15:35:36
Objet: [ADSM-L] Trying again
Didn't see a response to this so I'm trying one more time, cause I think
someone out there knows the answer.
We have 6 Netapp fileshares that have a small number of large files but TB
daily change rates.
When Snapdiff runs, we are not seeing the number of sessions we expect after
setting resourceutilization=10.
Is this due to how TSM is receiving the changed file list from the Netapp?
Would we be better off forcing CreateNewBase=yes on every run to increase
multi-threading?
Thanks,
-steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail
disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
|
ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC
|