ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started

2017-09-04 05:09:49
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started
From: Efim <aefim771 AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 12:07:09 +0300
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus End to End Preview
https://youtu.be/Zs6OhMLmu2Y <https://youtu.be/Zs6OhMLmu2Y>
Efim


> 4 сент. 2017 г., в 11:50, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM 
> DOT COM> написал(а):
> 
> Hi Stefan,
> From what I have been reading SP Plus will be a software appliance, delivered 
> as an OVA file, which can be used as a stand-alone solution, but which also 
> should fit into an existing TSM/SP environment. From 
> https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/ibm-spectrum-protect-plus: "It can be 
> implemented as a stand-alone solution or integrate with your IBM Spectrum 
> Protect environment to off-load copies for long term storage and data 
> governance with scale and efficiency".
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Stefan Folkerts
> Sent: zondag 3 september 2017 8:04
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started
> 
> Steve,
> 
> I don't think you should look at Spectrum Protect Plus as an improved 
> Spectrum Protect.
> It's a totally different solution for a, for the most part, different 
> environment.
> Spectrum Protect is an enterprise class catch-all backup & recovery solution, 
> Spectrum Protect Plus looks more to me like an entry-level vSphere/Hyper-V 
> point solution.
> 
> That doesn't mean it doesn't have its place in the market, it does, but that 
> does mean that if you have a Spectrum Protect solution in place it would seem 
> a bit silly maybe, but then again, there are very few details released at 
> this point.
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Schaub, Steve <Steve_Schaub AT bcbst DOT com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Just got back from VMWorld where IBM announced their new & improved SP 
>> product, I would hold off until you can check it out, much easier to 
>> deploy & manage.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
>> Of Stefan Folkerts
>> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:06 PM
>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started
>> 
>> Rick,
>> 
>> I would run the 8.1.1 VE version if your vSphere stack supports it, 
>> the biggest improvements in my eyes above the 7.1 version are the 
>> restore performance that can go 5x in the right configuration (in my 
>> experience) and the tagging support (if you vShpere folder structure 
>> will work with it, but if not, you can always go for the classic scheduling 
>> method.
>> The improved restore performance of 8.1.0+ has proven very important 
>> and it was good it came when it did because in previous versions it 
>> became a pretty big issue.
>> 8.1+ VE on a 7.1 server should not be a problem in my experience.
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Ehresman,David E. < 
>> david.ehresman AT louisville DOT edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> It's been reported here that the restore time in the v8.1 CLIENT is 
>>> much improved over v7 so I would recommend that one for the client.  
>>> I am not sure the server version makes a difference for this situation.
>>> 
>>> David Ehresman
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On 
>>> Behalf Of Rhodes, Richard L.
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:51 AM
>>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>>> Subject: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> Up till now we have used BA clients in VM's.  We would like to look 
>>> into implementing VE.  I would appreciate any wisdom on bringing it 
>>> up first time.  A specific question would be which version.  Our 
>>> current TSM servers are v7.1.5, but I'm wondering if bringing up a 
>>> v8.1 server and VE would be best.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Rick
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------------------
>>> 
>>> The information contained in this message is intended only for the 
>>> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If 
>>> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent 
>>> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are 
>>> hereby notified that you have received this document in error and 
>>> that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
>>> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
>>> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the 
>>> original message.
>>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of 
>> Tennessee E-mail disclaimer:  
>> http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
>> 
> ********************************************************
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential 
> and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may 
> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to 
> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you 
> have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by 
> return e-mail, and delete this message. 
> 
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
> this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered 
> number 33014286
> ********************************************************


ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC