IBM Spectrum Protect Plus End to End Preview
https://youtu.be/Zs6OhMLmu2Y <https://youtu.be/Zs6OhMLmu2Y>
Efim
> 4 сент. 2017 г., в 11:50, Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM
> DOT COM> написал(а):
>
> Hi Stefan,
> From what I have been reading SP Plus will be a software appliance, delivered
> as an OVA file, which can be used as a stand-alone solution, but which also
> should fit into an existing TSM/SP environment. From
> https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/ibm-spectrum-protect-plus: "It can be
> implemented as a stand-alone solution or integrate with your IBM Spectrum
> Protect environment to off-load copies for long term storage and data
> governance with scale and efficiency".
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> Of Stefan Folkerts
> Sent: zondag 3 september 2017 8:04
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started
>
> Steve,
>
> I don't think you should look at Spectrum Protect Plus as an improved
> Spectrum Protect.
> It's a totally different solution for a, for the most part, different
> environment.
> Spectrum Protect is an enterprise class catch-all backup & recovery solution,
> Spectrum Protect Plus looks more to me like an entry-level vSphere/Hyper-V
> point solution.
>
> That doesn't mean it doesn't have its place in the market, it does, but that
> does mean that if you have a Spectrum Protect solution in place it would seem
> a bit silly maybe, but then again, there are very few details released at
> this point.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Schaub, Steve <Steve_Schaub AT bcbst DOT com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just got back from VMWorld where IBM announced their new & improved SP
>> product, I would hold off until you can check it out, much easier to
>> deploy & manage.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
>> Of Stefan Folkerts
>> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 1:06 PM
>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started
>>
>> Rick,
>>
>> I would run the 8.1.1 VE version if your vSphere stack supports it,
>> the biggest improvements in my eyes above the 7.1 version are the
>> restore performance that can go 5x in the right configuration (in my
>> experience) and the tagging support (if you vShpere folder structure
>> will work with it, but if not, you can always go for the classic scheduling
>> method.
>> The improved restore performance of 8.1.0+ has proven very important
>> and it was good it came when it did because in previous versions it
>> became a pretty big issue.
>> 8.1+ VE on a 7.1 server should not be a problem in my experience.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Ehresman,David E. <
>> david.ehresman AT louisville DOT edu> wrote:
>>
>>> It's been reported here that the restore time in the v8.1 CLIENT is
>>> much improved over v7 so I would recommend that one for the client.
>>> I am not sure the server version makes a difference for this situation.
>>>
>>> David Ehresman
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On
>>> Behalf Of Rhodes, Richard L.
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 10:51 AM
>>> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
>>> Subject: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect for VE - how to get started
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Up till now we have used BA clients in VM's. We would like to look
>>> into implementing VE. I would appreciate any wisdom on bringing it
>>> up first time. A specific question would be which version. Our
>>> current TSM servers are v7.1.5, but I'm wondering if bringing up a
>>> v8.1 server and VE would be best.
>>>
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>> The information contained in this message is intended only for the
>>> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
>>> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
>>> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
>>> hereby notified that you have received this document in error and
>>> that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
>>> message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>>> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the
>>> original message.
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of
>> Tennessee E-mail disclaimer:
>> http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm
>>
> ********************************************************
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential
> and privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the
> addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may
> be disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to
> this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you
> have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by
> return e-mail, and delete this message.
>
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its
> employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of
> this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch
> Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered
> number 33014286
> ********************************************************
|