ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] SAP HANA backup expiration

2017-06-21 08:21:12
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SAP HANA backup expiration
From: Del Hoobler <hoobler AT US.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 08:18:06 -0400
Hi Eric,

SAP did not release a change needed to do this within the API so the 
Spectrum Protect team will handle this directly.


Del

----------------------------------------------------

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 06/21/2017 
04:26:33 AM:

> From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Date: 06/21/2017 04:28 AM
> Subject: Re: SAP HANA backup expiration
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> 
> Hi Del!
> Thank you very much for your explanation. I discovered that the 
> delete through HANA studio works as expected. I noticed however a 
> large amount of files in TSM which do no longer exist in HANA, so we
> are working on a script to remove them too. I do not know how these 
> backups get stuck in TSM...
> I really hope IBM will soon support versioning again, it would make 
> life much easier. The fact that you say IBM has plans to support it 
> in a future release, does that mean that SAP has removed/fixed the 
> HANA BACKINT API limitation?
> Kind regards,
> Eric van Loon
> Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On 
> Behalf Of Del Hoobler
> Sent: maandag 19 juni 2017 15:48
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: SAP HANA backup expiration
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> Once the backups have been deleted in HANA Studio, then HANA will 
> delay the actual deletion of the objects in Spectrum Protect. It is 
> not known or documented by SAP how long this delay may be or on what
> it depends. We have seen a delay of several minutes. If you delete a
> large number of objects, HANA will delete them in chunks of 500 objects.
> 
> The actual deletion can be checked in the 'backint.log' file. After 
> some time there will be entries like this:
> 
> BKI2003I: File R26___A0HZTF1HWY_RZ_TSM_SERVER@MC_DISK#160701 00000
> /usr/sap/R26/SYS/global/hdb/backint/2016_09_20_databackup_4_1 deleted.
> #DELETED "R26___A0HZTF1HWY" 
> "/usr/sap/R26/SYS/global/hdb/backint/2016_09_20_databackup_4_1"
> BKI2003I: File R26___A0HZTF1HWY_RZ_TSM_SERVER@MC_DISK#150700 00000
> /usr/sap/R26/SYS/global/hdb/backint/2016_09_20_databackup_2_1 deleted.
> #DELETED "R26___A0HZTF1HWY" 
> "/usr/sap/R26/SYS/global/hdb/backint/2016_09_20_databackup_2_1"
> BKI2003I: File R26___A0HZTF1HWY_RZ_TSM_SERVER@MC_DISK#140699 00000
> /usr/sap/R26/SYS/global/hdb/backint/2016_09_20_databackup_3_1 deleted.
> #DELETED "R26___A0HZTF1HWY" 
> "/usr/sap/R26/SYS/global/hdb/backint/2016_09_20_databackup_3_1"
> BKI2003I: File R26___A0HZTF1HWY_RZ_TSM_SERVER@MC_DISK#130698 00000
> /usr/sap/R26/SYS/global/hdb/backint/2016_09_20_databackup_1_1 deleted.
> #DELETED "R26___A0HZTF1HWY" 
> "/usr/sap/R26/SYS/global/hdb/backint/2016_09_20_databackup_1_1"
> 
> 
> IBM does plan to add support for expiration based on version limit 
> in a future delivery.
> 
> 
> 
> Del
> 
> 
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 06/19/2017 
> 05:22:33 AM:
> 
> > From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Date: 06/19/2017 05:23 AM
> > Subject: SAP HANA backup expiration
> > Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> > 
> > Dear Del,
> > About a year ago you explained why TDP for HANA backup versioning is
> > no longer working (see your mail down below), do you know if SAP has
> > fixed this issue by now?
> > I'm still struggling with this in our environment. The only 
> > documentation I can find on the IBM site about this issue is 
> > IT11810. It contains two options:
> > 
> > 1)      Create a new domain and use the retver option, which could 
> > cause all you backups to expire when no backup is made during that 
> > period (so not acceptable for us).
> > 
> > 2)      Remove obsolete backup manually through SAP Studio.
> > When we use option 2, the backups seem to be removed from SAP, but I
> > still see the archive objects in TSM... Is this circumvention maybe 
> > documented somewhere in more detail?
> > Thank you very much for your help in advance!
> > Kind regards,
> > Eric van Loon
> > Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
> > 
> > 
> > Eric,
> > This "design change" is a "change" from the Data Protection for ERP 
> > perspective, but not from the Data Protection for ERP for SAP HANA
> > perspective, which has always worked this way.
> > This design "change" is a result of a current limitation in the SAP 
> > HANA BACKINT API and is expected to be temporary.  This backup API 
> streams the
> > backup data to the DP for SAP HANA client via named pipes and today 
> > it gives no indication whether the data stream was complete or the 
pipe 
> was
> > closed prematurely due to some error.
> > We don't want to expire a prior/older backup version unless we know 
> > we have a successful new backup version so we do not currently offer
> > expiration of backups based on version limit.  However, we do plan 
> > to provide that capability once SAP implements the enhancement to the 
> backup
> > API we have requested (to indicate whether or not all the data was 
> > streamed  successfully).  SAP did indicate they plan to provide that
> > enhancement but we do not yet have a target date for that.
> > Thank you,
> > Del
> > ********************************************************
> > For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> > http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> > confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee 
> > only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of
> > the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or 
> > distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or 
> > attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
> > received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately 
> > by return e-mail, and delete this message.
> > 
> > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/
> > or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete
> > transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
> > any delay in receipt.
> > Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> > Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> > registered number 33014286
> > ********************************************************
> > 
> ********************************************************
> For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
> http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain 
> confidential and privileged material intended for the addressee 
> only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that no part of
> the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or 
> distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or 
> attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
> received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately 
> by return e-mail, and delete this message. 
> 
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/
> or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete
> transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
> any delay in receipt. 
> Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal 
> Dutch Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with 
> registered number 33014286
> ********************************************************
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC