Restore performance is going to be incredible if you have a lot of drives,
you can practically fill a 10Gb/s connection using 48 nearline drives.


On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:47 AM, adsm consulting <adsmcons AT gmail DOT com>
wrote:

> Hi Stefan,
> not very technical reason, V5030 was already available because an Oracle
> RAC is just migrated to Flashsystem 900, so we reused it for this new
> spectrum protect, instead buy a lower spec storage.
> Also performance will better for sure on SAS drives versus NL-SAS.
>
> JR
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Folkerts <
> stefan.folkerts AT gmail DOT com
> > wrote:
>
> > No knowledge about that type of Linux cluster.
> > Could you explain why you picked the V5030 over the V5020 and why you are
> > going for 15K drives in a system that will use the containerpool?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:48 AM, adsm consulting <adsmcons AT gmail DOT com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > We are planning to implement spectrum protect 8.1 in RHEL cluster with
> 2
> > > nodes for HA reason.
> > > The shared SAN storage will be a storwize V5030, with disks for
> database
> > on
> > > SSD and SAS15Krpm for directory container storage pools.
> > > Also we will have in near feature a TS3310 for copy container for in
> site
> > > protection.
> > >
> > >
> > > In the knowledge center there is no configuration examples abount
> Redhat
> > > Enterprise linux clustering (pacemaker).
> > > So I am asking if anybody has made this kind of configuration before
> me.
> > >
> > > Blueprint linux 3.1 can give some indication only for standard no
> > clustered
> > > configuration.
> > > Infact for example no LVM configuration is made.
> > > One of my question is for example about Database disks:
> > > On the storage i will made 4 VDISK (LUN), i shuld put them in unique VG
> > and
> > > split after in 4 LV? Or si prefferred to made 4 VG with 1 LV each?
> > >
> > > Thank you if somebody will share his experience.
> > >
> > > Greetings.
> > >
> > > James R.
> > >
> >
>