On 24.4.2017. 15:29, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Sasa Drnjevic <Sasa.Drnjevic AT srce DOT hr>
> wrote:
>
>> -are those volumes R/W ?  if not, check ACTLOG
>>
>> -check MOUNTLimit for affected devclass(es)
>>
>> -check MAXSIze for affected stg pool(s)
>>
>
> Hi Sasa,
>
> Thank you for the hints.
>
> Yes, all are R/W.
>
> How does MOUNTLimit and MAXSize (set to NOLIMIT) effect the fillings?


In the case of disk which migrates to tape - if a disk volume is too
small to hold a big file, data store process will mount and directly use
tape instead of disk...

Not, sure when only seq disk used...

MOUNTLimit could make trouble if it's set too low, but it doesn't seem
to be that in your case...

the question is why it is not reusing 0,5% filling volumes... Can you
try collocation on small group of nodes?

Regards.

--
Sasa Drnjevic
www.srce.unizg.hr





>
> --
> *Zoltan Forray*
> Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
> Xymon Monitor Administrator
> VMware Administrator
> Virginia Commonwealth University
> UCC/Office of Technology Services
> www.ucc.vcu.edu
> zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
> Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
> never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
> security number or confidential personal information. For more details
> visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
>