ADSM-L

[ADSM-L] delete volume

2017-03-21 11:09:31
Subject: [ADSM-L] delete volume
From: "Loon, Eric van (ITOPT3) - KLM" <Eric-van.Loon AT KLM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:05:22 +0000
Hi all!
I just had to delete a tape with discarddata=yes because an audit wasn't able 
to fix the volume. I witnessed something unexpected: as soon as you delete a 
volume, it immediately becomes scratch and it is being relabeled (because of 
VTL requirements). This means that if you accidently delete a volume and you 
want to recover it, let's say one day later, by restoring the database to a 
point before the deletion, chances are great the tape was already reused and 
overwritten. In fact, I think the relabel process itself will probably render 
the data unrecoverable.
Shouldn't a delete volume make a volume pending instead of scratch?
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
Air France/KLM Storage Engineering
********************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message.

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt.
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
********************************************************

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>