On 13.1.2017. 13:42, Conny Landstedt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, that is possible, we did just that when we went from our old environment 
> to our new container based.


Thank you - that is great news :-)

Best regards,

--
Sasa Drnjevic
www.srce.unizg.hr





> Our new primary server had container and file storage pools, the secondary 
> server acting as target for replication only had a container storage pool.
>
> We migrated from our old environment into the file pool since support to 
> migrate to a container pool was not supported at the time. That file pool was 
> then replicated using replicate node to our secondary server.
>
> Best regards
> Conny Landstedt
>
> *****
>
> On 13.1.2017. 9:17, Conny Landstedt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The same target container pool for both PROTECT STG and REPLICATE
>> NODE, otherwise the whole concept of combining them fails.
>>
>> This IBM Technote goes further into the matter
>> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21978041
>>
>> Best regards Conny Landstedt
>
>
> Hi,
> and thank you for the link.
>
> The following is clearly stated in that IBM Technote:
>
> "It is perfectly possible to replicate objects from a source container pool 
> to a target traditional VOLUME based storage pool (such as tape)."
>
>
> My question - is it possible to replicate the other way around?
>
> From traditional VOLUME based storage pool as a source to a target container 
> pool?
>
> At the moment we are replicating from a traditional VOLUME based storage pool 
> (DISK and TAPE) to another remote location traditional DISK based storage 
> pool.
>
> But, I would like to replace the target stg pool with the container pool to 
> save disk space at the remote location.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Sasa Drnjevic
> www.srce.unizg.hr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Hi to  all
>>
>> A question to people using PROTECT STG and REPLICATE  NODE what will
>> be the best practice to use in the target side for STGPOOL
>>
>> One STG  for the protect stg and another STG for the replicate nodes ,
>> or only one for everything ???
>>
>> Both TSM servers version 7.1.7  with O.S Windows 2012 64B
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Robert
>>