ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] query auditocc question

2016-07-27 09:16:05
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] query auditocc question
From: David Ehresman <david.ehresman AT LOUISVILLE DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:13:27 +0000
Perhaps the following query would give you better data:

select node_name,sum(reporting_mb) as "TOTAL_OCCUPANCY" from occupancy group by 
node_name


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Paul_Dudley
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 9:35 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] query auditocc question

To keep track of our primary storage usage, on a weekly basis I run the 
following command:



query auditocc pooltype=primary



For one of the nodes - an SQL server - it is reporting that the backup storage 
used is 7Tb.

However knowing the size of the databases on that server and the number of 
copies of each backup we keep, I believe that to be incorrect.

I started the DP for SQL client on that server, clicked on Restore Data, and 
then selected all backups (both active and inactive).

I then added up the size of each backup (both active and inactive) and it added 
up to 2.2Tb.



How could there be such a huge difference between each total?





Thanks & Regards

Paul Dudley

IT Operations

ANL Container Line

pdudley AT anl.com DOT au








ANL DISCLAIMER

This e-mail and any file attached is confidential, and intended solely to the 
named add
ressees. Any unauthorised dissemination or use is strictly prohibited. If you 
received
this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail 
from your s
ystem. Please do not copy, use or make reference to it for any purpose, or 
disclose its
 contents to any person.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>