ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ADSM-L] DEVCLASS=FILE - what am I missing

2015-02-16 11:10:39
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DEVCLASS=FILE - what am I missing
From: Paul Zarnowski <psz1 AT CORNELL DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 11:02:08 -0500 
One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is how the use of FILE or DISK impacts 
server recovery.  If you have to restore your database, you will have to audit 
all of your DISK volumes.  You can avoid auditing FILE or TAPE volumes through 
the use of REUSEDELAY.

..Paul

At 01:52 PM 2/13/2015, Zoltan Forray wrote:
>Thanks for all the replies.  Pretty much confirms that FILE isn't for me.
>We don't do dedupe and there are a lot of manual/monitoring processes
>involved (I have enough to do with 8-TSM servers I manage - don't need
>more).


--
Paul Zarnowski                            Ph: 607-255-4757
Assistant Director for Storage Services   Fx: 607-255-8521
IT at Cornell / Infrastructure            Em: psz1 AT cornell DOT edu
719 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853-3801
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ADSM-L] FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Rhodes, Richard L.
Next by Date:  [ADSM-L] FW: FW: v6.3.5 hung db2??, Rhodes, Richard L.
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ADSM-L] DEVCLASS=FILE - what am I missing, Zoltan Forray
Next by Thread:  Re: [ADSM-L] DEVCLASS=FILE - what am I missing, Bent Christensen
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]