ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] bind all files except .pst to new management class?

2014-06-24 12:18:24
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] bind all files except .pst to new management class?
From: "Arbogast, Warren K" <warbogas AT IU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:17:29 +0000
Thomas,
Thank you for responding, and for your analysis of the effect of the includes.

Keith

On Jun 24, 2014, at 11:40 AM, Thomas Denier wrote:

> I think this would have the desired effect on backup copies of files that 
> still exist on the client system, including backup copies of older versions 
> of those files. The proposed change would not affect management class 
> assignments for backup copies of files that have been deleted from the client 
> system.
> 
> Thomas Denier
> Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf 
> Of Arbogast, Warren K
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:50 AM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] bind all files except .pst to new management class?
> 
> A user wishes to bind all files except .pst files to a new management class 
> with more ample retention settings.  What's the best way to do this?  Is it 
> sufficient to bind all .pst files to a second management class --to keep them 
> from being bound to the new management class?
> 
> Something like this:
> include ?:\...\*        ample-mc
> include ?:\...\*.pst  meager-mc
> 
> Thank you,
> Keith Arbogast
> Indiana University
> 
> 
> The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and 
> confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person named 
> above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that 
> any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication 
> is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
> the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
> 
> CAUTION: Intended recipients should NOT use email communication for emergent 
> or urgent health care matters.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>