ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] : TSM Running out of Scratch Tapes

2013-07-09 05:34:25
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] : TSM Running out of Scratch Tapes
From: Chavdar Cholev <chavdar.cholev AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:32:42 +0300
Hello,
to add
1) Check if there is mismatch between tapes and drives (mean lto3 tapes for
LTO5 tapes)
2) check inf those tapes that you are inserting into library have been
properly labeled (check output from label libvol command)
3) I can not see in your log last 2 symbols about tape LTO generation I
mean xxxyyy*L4*
4) check to see in bar codes for new tapes are check summed or not and
verify library setting about this...


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Faisal Khan <faisal.ok AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> From the errors, it seems you are getting these against 2 Drives.
>
> * You can check through the actlog messages just before and after
> ANR8355E message to see what is    happening?
>
> * You can check those Tape Drive Device names in their paths are correct as
> seen on from OS?
>
> * You can verify if the Firmware of Tape/Drives and Library are on
> compatible levels with your environment.
>
> * You can try to run Audit from ACSLS and from TSM Server to match the
> inventory on both.
>
> * While checking in brand new scratch tapes(volumes), "Label Libvol"
> command should be used.
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Faisal Khan
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Adeel Mehmood <Ad.Mehmood AT diyarme DOT com
> >wrote:
>
> > Dears ,
> >
> > We are receiving below errors and the Scratch tapes goes to ZERO
> >
> > 07/04/2013 22:58:44      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 001736 in
> >                           drive DRIVE15 (mt10.0.0.2). (SESSION: 32773)
> > 07/04/2013 23:04:23      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 000588 in
> >                           drive DRIVE4 (mt7.0.0.1). (SESSION: 32799)
> > 07/04/2013 23:04:35      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 000482 in
> >                           drive DRIVE15 (mt10.0.0.2). (SESSION: 32806)
> > 07/04/2013 23:10:55      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 001058 in
> >                           drive DRIVE4 (mt7.0.0.1). (SESSION: 34240)
> > 07/04/2013 23:11:01      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 002081 in
> >                           drive DRIVE15 (mt10.0.0.2). (SESSION: 34242)
> > 07/04/2013 23:15:49      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 000468 in
> >                           drive DRIVE15 (mt10.0.0.2). (SESSION: 34242)
> > 07/04/2013 23:16:21      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 000828 in
> >                           drive DRIVE4 (mt7.0.0.1). (SESSION: 34240)
> > 07/04/2013 23:20:33      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 002284 in
> >                           drive DRIVE15 (mt10.0.0.2). (SESSION: 34242)
> > 07/04/2013 23:21:13      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 002084 in
> >                           drive DRIVE4 (mt7.0.0.1). (SESSION: 34240)
> > 07/04/2013 23:26:29      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 001367 in
> >                           drive DRIVE15 (mt10.0.0.2). (SESSION: 34255)
> > 07/04/2013 23:28:24      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 000386 in
> >                           drive DRIVE4 (mt7.0.0.1). (SESSION: 34215)
> > 07/04/2013 23:36:08      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 001804 in
> >                           drive DRIVE15 (mt10.0.0.2). (SESSION: 34215)
> > 07/04/2013 23:37:04      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 002323 in
> >                           drive DRIVE4 (mt7.0.0.1). (SESSION: 34255)
> > 07/04/2013 23:44:47      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 001814 in
> >                           drive DRIVE15 (mt10.0.0.2). (SESSION: 34255)
> > 07/04/2013 23:45:05      ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume
> > 002535 in
> >                           drive DRIVE4 (mt7.0.0.1). (SESSION: 24769)
> >
> > Thanks & best regards,
> > Adeel Mehmood
> >
> > From: Adeel Mehmood
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 7:36 AM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] : TSM Running out of Scratch Tapes
> >
> >
> > Dear ,
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your response . please find the answers below .
> >
> >
> >
> > It is most useful if you state which version of TSM server you are
> > running.   -------------- > TSM 6.2
> >
> > The OS it runs on and the tape media (LTO3/4/5 etc.) would be helpful
> > -------------------- > Windows 2008 Server , configured with SL3000
> Library
> > through ACSLS Software having 14 x HP LTO4  FC Tape Drives.
> >
> >
> >
> > What retention policies are in place for the domain copy groups? If
> > NOLIMIT is in force, then data will never expire and will eventually use
> > all of your tapes
> > ---- > Retention Polices seems to be working fine as they are In place
> for
> > more than two years  & half years and we started facing this problem
> couple
> > of weeks back .
> >
> >
> > When you say tapes are becoming 'unavailable', is this the status of the
> > volume within TSM? (Do a 'q vol f=d' to check). If so, this is often
> > because you are trying to use tapes that have been physically removed
> from
> > the library. If TSM wants to use that tape, it will eventually place the
> > tape in an 'UNAVAILABLE' state because it cannot mount the volume in the
> > library as a result of being removed.
> >
> > ----- > we are 100 % sure that the tapes are physically inside .The
> > NEW/OLD tapes become UNAVAILABLE , whenever the TSM try to use them for
> > backup or restore.
> > but once we make them available , we could use them for some time . till
> > they get unavailable again .
> >
> >
> >
> > In terms of running low on scratch, as the previous poster said, make
> sure
> > expiration and reclaim is running. In particular, make sure reclaim is
> > running and actually completing. The SUMMARY table will report on
> > expiration and reclaim activity over a period of time (usually 28 days)
> >
> > ----- > we double check the same.
> >
> >
> >
> > How many versions of database backups do you retain?
> >
> > ------ > 14 versions
> >
> >
> >
> > These are common causes of tape problems.
> >
> > ------ > we are using Brand New Tapes and they are also getting
> > UNAVAILABLE ,
> > also we opened a case with Library Vendor and they said all is well .
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards, Adeel
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On 
> > Behalf Of
> > white jeff
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 12:17 AM
> > To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU<mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> > Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] : TSM Running out of Scratch Tapes
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi
> >
> >
> >
> > It is most useful if you state which version of TSM server you are
> running.
> >
> > The OS it runs on and the tape media (LTO3/4/5 etc) would be helpful
> >
> >
> >
> > What retention policies are in place for the domain copygroups? If
> NOLIMIT
> > is in force, then data will never expire and will eventually use all of
> > your tapes
> >
> >
> >
> > When you say tapes are becoming 'unavailable', is this the status of the
> > volume within TSM? (Do a 'q vol f=d' to check). If so, this is often
> > because you are trying to use tapes that have been physically removed
> from
> > the library. If TSM wants to use that tape, it will eventually place the
> > tape in an 'UNAVAILABLE' state because it cannot mount the volume in the
> > library as a result of being removed.
> >
> >
> >
> > In terms of running low on scratch, as the previous poster said, make
> sure
> > expiration and reclaim is running. In particular, make sure reclaim is
> > running and actually completing. The SUMMARY table will report on
> > expiration and reclaim activity over a period of time (usually 28 days)
> >
> >
> >
> > Establish the percent-reclaimable space of your tape volumes. Use this
> >
> > command:
> >
> >
> >
> > SELECT VOLUME_NAME, STGPOOL_NAME, PCT_RECLAIM, STATUS FROM VOLUMES WHERE
> >
> > VOLUME_NAME LIKE '%L3'   (This is assuming you are using LTO3 tape.
> Change
> >
> > accordingly)
> >
> >
> >
> > How many versions of database backups do you retain?
> >
> >
> >
> > These are common causes of tape problems.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8 July 2013 10:13, Adeel Mehmood <Ad.Mehmood AT diyarme DOT com<mailto:
> > Ad.Mehmood AT diyarme DOT com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Dears ,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > We are facing problem as the TSM scratch tapes are running out , also
> >
> > > the tapes becoming unavailable .
> >
> > > Please advise , how to handle this issue .
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Thanks , Adeel
> >
> > >
> >
> > > ________________________________
> >
> > >
> >
> > > D I S C L A I M E R
> >
> > >
> >
> > > The information in this email and in any files transmitted with it, is
> >
> > > intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or
> >
> > > privileged material. Access to this email by anyone else is
> unauthorized.
> >
> > > If you receive this in error, please contact the sender immediately
> >
> > > and delete the material from any computer. If you are not the intended
> >
> > > recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
> >
> > > or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited.
> >
> > > Statement and opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
> >
> > > sender, and do not necessarily reflect those of the company.
> >
> > >
> >
>