ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] DB backups in v6 land. And, BACK DB dedupdev=yes... ?

2013-06-05 02:12:23
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DB backups in v6 land. And, BACK DB dedupdev=yes... ?
From: Karel Bos <tsm.wad AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 08:10:12 +0200
Hi,

I think doc stated not to use dev=file shared=yes for TSM db backups. From 
memory it didn't specify why, but easy to setup dedicated file dev for tsm db 
backup only. DDM doesn't care anyways, it does dedup over all data stored in it.

Kind regards,
Karel


----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: Allen S. Rout <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
Verzonden: dinsdag 4 juni 2013 20:53
Aan: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] DB backups in v6 land.  And, BACK DB dedupdev=yes... ?

So, the doc suggests that you shouldn't use this for FILE devclasses.
Anybody know anything about why?

Similarly, it talks about that feature being good for VTL applications,
but is quiet about TSM virtual volumes.  Seems odd; the dedupe
optimization would seem to be relatively generic, if it's not just for
[product X].

I'm musing about sending my DB backups straight to a Data Domain, and
syncing that offsite.  It'd take away one level of indirection from my
DR planning.


- Allen S. Rout