ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500

2013-04-23 12:54:11
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500
From: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:50:18 -0400
2-libraries with fixed drives. One library has 9 drives the other one has 8.

-------------
Zoltan Forray
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html
When you say in your 3494 that "each owns n-3592 drives":

Do your current TSM servers share the drives, or do you use it as if it is
2 separate physical libraries?

Wanda

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 10:28 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Equating current 3494 configuration to TS3500

As you are aware from previous posts, we are replacing our 3494 with a
TS3500/3584.

I am trying wrap my mind around the proper way to configure the TS3500 so
it functions the same way our 3494 does.  If changing our current
configuration makes things easier for the transition, now would be the time
to do it since the install is tentatively scheduled for May. This is our
current config:

We have 2-TSM servers acting at Library Managers/Owner, thus each LM has
its own "3494 category codes", each owns n-3592 drives, etc.  This was done
for redundancy, fail-over, etc. We have tape drives spinning most of the
time so having all library functionality and drives attached to only 1-TSM
server is not a good idea.

>From the server perspective, there is one control path to the library via
the IP address/connection.  In the 3494, each Library Manager is defined,
via the servers IP address.

Do I define 2-virtual libraries, 1-per library manager server?  Does this
mean the drives as well as storage cells are defined/associated to each
"virtual library"?

>From reading through the various TS3500 books, they cite multiple ways to
configure "Library Sharing", including virtual stuff since we are getting
the ALMS feature.

Since I have never dealt with the issue of a tape drive "path" being used
for library control path/function, I guess I need to define more than one
of these paths, in case the drive has a problem?

Thoughts?  Suggestions?


--
*Zoltan Forray*
TSM Software & Hardware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html