Every day, our EMC Data Protection Advisor server processes the data it
collects overnight from our dozens of TSM servers and blasts out to the client
administration teams a listing of the servers who haven't had a good scheduled
backup in at the past 24 hours. As long as the client administration team lists
kept on Exchange are reasonably current, the daily blast will get to someone
Mind you, I'm not saying that DPA is the best tool for this, but it's what we
use. I'm sure Tivoli's tools could be used for this approach as well.
On Nov 6, 2012, at 1:21 PM, "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT ICFI DOT COM>
> One of my customers is becoming effectively a "backup service bureau" for
> many remote departments (and the number of depts. they service is growing).
> The central TSM admins have access to the TSM clients in the glass house, but
> no access to the TSM clients for the remote departments.
> Currently they use TOR to send email to the remote machine owners when TSM
> clients fail or miss.
> Remote admins often ignore the emails; general result is TSM clients miss for
> long periods, and the central admins don't know whether there is a legitimate
> problem, the machine has been decommissioned, or the machine owner has been
> They are looking for a reporting tool that will provide a better way to
> handle this than sending email out into the vacuum of internet space and
> hoping for results. (And yes, my customer already has service agreements
> where the remote owners have agreed that dealing with the failures and misses
> is their responsibility. But that's not working now, and when the rubber
> meets the road, it's the TSM admins that get blamed when there are no
> One possibility I can think of (short of writing our own apps) is to have TSM
> send the info (via mail or snmp) to a ticketing system that generates a
> ticket that has to be addressed or it gets escalated to a manager. But I
> have no familiarity with such ticketing systems, so can't recommend one.
> So, what do other people in widely distributed environments do for this?
> Product recommendations welcomed, we'll look at them.