Re: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question

ADSM-L

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question

2012-04-10 08:04:01

Subject:	Re: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question
From:	Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:00:37 +0100

> dedupe of pool 1 should not affect pool 2 or 3 and vice versa. so that in
> case of a restore of a node, only one pool is needed. not the others
> because a chunk is stored there.
> so dedup of a chunk within a pool is ok, but not across all pools.
>
> Dedupe is not across pools.  Even if all 3 pools are deduped, it is done
within the storagepool.

Steven

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] dedup question, Alexander Heindl [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Ullrich Mänz [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Alexander Heindl Re: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Steven Langdale <= [ADSM-L] Antwort: Re: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Alexander Heindl Re: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Francisco Molero

Previous by Date:	[ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Alexander Heindl
Next by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Francisco Molero
Previous by Thread:	[ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Alexander Heindl
Next by Thread:	[ADSM-L] Antwort: Re: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] Antwort: [ADSM-L] dedup question, Alexander Heindl
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]