ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: logical libraries in VTL

2012-03-01 02:18:20
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Ang: logical libraries in VTL
From: Steven Langdale <steven.langdale AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:15:42 +0000
It looks like Allen has had a better experience, but in my recent
experience with ProtecTIER, 2 logical libraries with NetBackup & TSM
feeding in the "same data" (we were migrating to TSM) the data WAS
"different" and dedupe ratios dropped like a stone.

As for using it as a  justification to migrate eveything to TSM, it is
obviously true, but in my opinion a weak argument.  It could easily be
remedied by throwing in some more disk.  You should focus on the management
costs of running multiple environments.  e.g. do you have an automated
backup check that generates problem tickets for backup failures?  just TSM
= one ticket interface.  The list goes on.

Steven


On 1 March 2012 06:19, Mehdi Salehi <ezzobad AT gmail DOT com> wrote:

> Thanks all.
> Could "better deduplicaion ratio" be one of justifications to migrate
> BackupExec systems to TSM? Actually half of our systems use non-TSM
> solutions and we (TSM guyes) would like to entice them to a single solution
> for the whole enterprise. You know everybody resist change!
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>