ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] tsm and data domain

2011-06-16 17:16:22
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] tsm and data domain
From: "Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT" <Andy.Huebner AT ALCONLABS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:12:04 -0500
I use DDs as a VTL.  Works good, in the aggregate it is fast.  It can restore 
faster the 1Gb Ethernet (no 10Gb yet), I have heard some people complain that 
the restore was slow, I have not experienced it being slow.
Meets my needs.  I do not use NFS and I do not replicate yet.
The GUI needs lots of work, but I try to avoid it anyway.

Andy Huebner

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Tim Brown
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:50 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] tsm and data domain

Any one use emc's data domain devices for storage pools and replication

Would like to here positive and negative issues.



Thanks,



Tim Brown
Systems Specialist - Project Leader
Central Hudson Gas & Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbrown AT cenhud DOT com <<mailto:tbrown AT cenhud DOT com>>
Phone: 845-486-5643
Fax: 845-486-5921
Cell: 845-235-4255




This message contains confidential information and is only for the intended 
recipient. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an 
employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended 
recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this note and 
deleting all copies and attachments.

This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized 
representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying 
or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments.

Thank you.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>