Re: [ADSM-L] TIP performance on Windows

Wanda, did you try IE9? Suggest you install it on a test PC first, IE9 has
just been released. I have been using the release candidate and it really is
noticeable faster than anything else.

Regards,

Joerg Pohlmann

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 13:43
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TIP performance on Windows

Thanks for your response!

Performance degradation is throughout, for even the simplest functions.
For example,
When I pull down Select Action > Create Schedule, it takes 8 seconds to open
the Create Schedule wizard.
When I click the Next button on the first page of the Create Schedule
wizard, response is 5 seconds.
When I then click the Cancel button, response is 7 seconds.
This was not a problem with the 6.1.3.0 ISC; no other hardware or software
has changed, except upgrading the ISC  from 6.1.3.0 to TIP 6.2, and
upgrading TSM from 6.1.3.3. to TSM 6.2.2.

There is no delay getting response back from the TSM server; response to Q
schedule from the admin command line is sub-second.
My connection to the server is via 127.0.0.1, so there should be no network
delay involved.
IE browser is IE7.0.5730.13.
You did give me an idea, though; I installed Mozilla 3.05 and response seems
to be about half that of IE, although still not as good as for ISC 6.1.3.

Any suggestions welcomed - if you can point me to any resources for
improving this I would appreciate it.  My customer is not happy with the
upgrade experience!

Thanks
Wanda Prather



-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Gergana V Markova
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 12:54 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TIP performance on Windows

Wanda,

what browser are you using in particular?
And are you seeing the performance degradation in specific areas of the
interface ( e.g health Monitor? )

Thanks.

Regards/Pozdravi, Gergana

| |      ~\\  !  //~
| |   ( ( 'o . o' ) )    Imagination can change the equation . . .
| |        (  w  )
| |  Gergana V Markova        gmarkova AT us.ibm DOT com  (+1 US) 520 799 5716
T/L 321-5716
| |  Advisory Software Engineer - IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Server
Development
| |
| | IBM Centers for Advanced Studies   http://www.ibm.com/ibm/cas
| | IBM Women Inventors Community
http://w3.webahead.ibm.com/w3ki/display/womeninventors/Home
| | IBM Emerging Technologies              http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/
| | IBM DeveloperWorks
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/
| | IBM Women In Action
http://w3.tap.ibm.com/w3ki2/display/AoTWIT/3.+Women+Speaker+Series+2009



From:
"Prather, Wanda" <wPrather AT ICFI DOT COM>
To:
ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
Date:
03/11/2011 02:31 PM
Subject:
[ADSM-L] TIP performance on Windows



TSM on Win2K3 (32 bit),
4-way processor, 16G ram, EMC disk, 260GB TSM data base, standard d-2-t
backup, no dedup.
Runs like a cheetah.
AC on the same server as TSM.

Recently upgraded in place from
TSM 6.1.3.3 w/ AC 6.1.3 to
TSM 6.2.2.0 w/ TIP 6.2

TSM server & DB2 still run like a cheetah.
But the TIP performance is miserably sloooooooow compared to previous
performance of AC 6.1.3, which was quite spiffy.
Nothing else changed with the hardware or workload; accessing the TIP the
same way we accessed AC6.1.3, from the browser on the server hosting the TIP
itself.

Can anybody point me to resources for identifying/improving TIP performance
issues?

Thx
Wanda






Wanda Prather  |  Senior Technical Specialist  | wprather AT icfi DOT com<
mailto:wprather AT icfi DOT com>  |  www.jasi.com<www.jasi.com%20> ICF Jacob &
Sundstrom  | 401 E. Pratt St, Suite 2214, Baltimore, MD 21202
| 410.539.1135