[ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB

ADSM-L

[Top] [All Lists]

[ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB

2010-12-09 03:19:21

Subject:	[ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB
From:	Mehdi Salehi <ezzobad AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:48:00 +0330

Hi,
Drives are LTO4, devclass is ULTRIUM4C, but all "Full" volumes are between
800GB to 1TB. Is it normal? It seems TSM does not use compression.

Mehdi

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Mehdi Salehi <= Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Steven Langdale Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Mehdi Salehi Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Richard Sims Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Hans Christian Riksheim Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Wolfgang J Moeller Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Maurice van 't Loo Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Scott McCambly Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Prather, Wanda Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Richard Sims Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Prather, Wanda

Previous by Date:	[ADSM-L] Fastback client 2TB LUN limit, Nicholas Rodolfich
Next by Date:	Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Steven Langdale
Previous by Thread:	[ADSM-L] Fastback client 2TB LUN limit, Nicholas Rodolfich
Next by Thread:	Re: [ADSM-L] ULTRIUM4C but not 1.6TB, Steven Langdale
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]