ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] tsm v6 mem requirements for dedicated library manager instance

2010-11-04 11:36:01
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] tsm v6 mem requirements for dedicated library manager instance
From: Mikael Lindstrom <Mikael.Lindstrom AT SE.IBM DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 16:40:16 +0100
Hi,

Between 4-8 GB should be enough for a dedicated Lib Man (LM) server in
production. I personally would have used 8 GB memory just in case.
Even if you are upgrading the existing LM server to v6 the memory should
be enough since the LM database is kind of small in most cases.
There's an example of two TSM 6 upgrades at the TSM Wiki. Here the actual
AIX server had about 20 GB ram since it was a test server for testing
only.
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/wikis/display/tivolistoragemanager/Tivoli+Storage+Manager+V6+Upgrade+Examples

/Mikael






Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>
2010-11-04 16:19
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu>


To
ADSM-L AT vm.marist DOT edu
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] tsm v6 mem requirements for dedicated library manager instance






Hi,

We are looking at purchasing new AIX servers for our TSM  systems.  These
need to cover our eventual TSM v6 conversion.  The one area where we're
confused is our library manager instance.

Any suggestions on the memory needs for a v6 dedicated library manager TSM
instance?

Thanks

Rick


-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>