[ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....SOLVED, but some questions
2010-09-07 05:09:44
Thanks to Henrik Wahlstedt this got solved.
Henrik, tack för hjälpen och telefonsamtalet, jag har faktiskt inte fått nåt
mail från dig...
Restore processing finished.
Total number of objects restored: 137
Total number of objects failed: 0
Total number of bytes transferred: 59.12 MB
Data transfer time: 42.65 sec
Network data transfer rate: 1,419.17 KB/sec
Aggregate data transfer rate: 188.75 KB/sec
Elapsed processing time: 00:05:20
The first restore had the filespecification:
restore "\\fspas01cl001\z$\mpy-it\users\p950kaz\my pictures\pic\*"
If I changed it to restore "\\fspas01cl001\z$\mpy-it\users\p950kaz\my
pictures\pic\?*"
The client got direct "waiting for offline media" and started to restore the
files after the tapes got mounted
So I tried again with only *, and got the same problem as before:
tsm> restore "\\fspas01cl001\z$\mpy-it\users\p950kaz\my pictures\pic\*"
c:\restored2\ -subdir=yes
Restore function invoked.
ANS1247I Waiting for files from the server...
Some questions:
Whats the difference between ?* and only *
Why don't I see a restore session when I ran q restore with the ?* filespec,
tsm: ADSM4>q restore
ANR2034E QUERY RESTORE: No match found using this criteria.
ANS8001I Return code 11.
And the restore starts right away
When I run with only * I get this in the log:
2010-09-07 10:51:52 ANR1182I Removable volume 006811 is required for a restore
request from session 2717.
2010-09-07 10:51:53 ANR1182I Removable volume 005763 is required for a restore
request from session 2717.
2010-09-07 10:51:53 ANR1182I Removable volume 005902 is required for a restore
request from session 2717.
2010-09-07 10:51:53 ANR1183I Initial determination of removable volumes
required for a restore request from session 2717 is complete. Additional
volumes may still be required.
tsm: ADSM4>q restore
Sess Restore Elapsed Node Name Filespace FSID
Number State Minutes Name
------ ----------- ------- ------------------------- ----------- ----------
2,717 Active 10 FSPAS01FS039 \\fspas01c- 1
l001\z$\m-
py-it
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] För Remco
Post
Skickat: den 7 september 2010 10:39
Till: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Ämne: Re: [ADSM-L] SV: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....
Hi,
I'm sorry, but you are wrong, duplex mismatch Does cause the speed to drop to
Aboutaleb 5K/s. I've Deen Thissen on numerous occasions.
--
Gr., Remco
On 7 sep. 2010, at 08:02, Niklas Lundström <niklas.lundstrom AT SWEDBANK DOT
SE> wrote:
> I actually restored the files to my workstation, and the network settings are
> fine
> Duplex mismatch does not cause the speed to go down to modem-speed from
> 1995....
>
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] För Remco
> Post
> Skickat: den 7 september 2010 07:40
> Till: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Ämne: Re: [ADSM-L] 50Mb restored in 4.18h....
>
> On 7 sep 2010, at 07:02, Niklas Lundström wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I just did a restore of 50Mb and it took 4h 18min
>> If it had been 50Gb I wouldn't complain
>>
>> Total number of objects restored: 114
>> Total number of objects failed: 0
>> Total number of bytes transferred: 50.99 MB
>> Data transfer time: 9,426.15 sec
>> Network data transfer rate: 5.53 KB/sec <--------------
>> Aggregate data transfer rate: 3.36 KB/sec
>> Elapsed processing time: 04:18:55
>>
>> The server has a lot of files, almost 7 million including the copypool. The
>> TSM DB is really big, 180Gb and 94% full.
>> TSM Server 5.5.4.
>>
>> Does anyone have a clue of why the restore took so long?
>>
>
> your network sucks? (to put it mildly :) ) I'd check to see if there is any
> mismatch in duplex settings anywhere. Remember, auto-negotiation on the host,
> and a fixed 100 full-duplex setting on the switch will lead to a host at
> half-duplex and tons of collisions.
>
>
>> It found what volumes to mount fast, but then the client was "Waiting for
>> files from the server....."
>>
>> People here are complaining about TSM and that the restores takes long time
>> and it's hard to defend it when the restore takes so long...
>>
>
> --
>
> Met vriendelijke groeten/Kind regards,
>
> Remco Post
|
|
|