ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Celerra NDMP Sanity Check

2010-03-22 21:53:14
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Celerra NDMP Sanity Check
From: Nick Laflamme <dplaflamme AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:52:46 -0500
On Mar 22, 2010, at 6:38 PM, David McClelland wrote:

> Hi Nick,
> 
> I did have a look for my old notes earlier today but I'm afraid I'm drawing
> a blank (they'd be from over 5 years ago...).
> 
> In summary (from what I remember) the customer had a TSM Server library
> manager instance for a Quantum P7000 running 16 or so LTO2 drives. The
> Celerra was defined as a datamover on this and there were paths defined for
> these drives mapped to the special device files on the datamover. The TSM
> Server acted as a library manager in pretty much the same way as it would
> for any library client. In fact, it's pretty much the config described in
> 'Configuration 1' in the TSM docs on the subject >>> http://bit.ly/9KVVXS
> 
> There is the option, as your Celerra admins seem to suggest, to have the
> Celerra connect to its own dedicated library (as per 'Configuration 2' in
> the above document) and it's perhaps this that they have been referring to.
> As far as I remember, the basic configuration was pretty much as per the TSM
> NDMP docs, nothing much sticks in my mind as being Celerra-specific. Keep in
> mind that my info might be a little out of date now, but I'm sure any major
> game-changes would be clear in the IBM docs.

OK, thanks. I know my predecessors made it work with a shared library; I 
suspect it was a lot of trial-and-error, and if there's a "smarter" way, I'd 
love to find it. 

> Hope that helps,

It doesn't hurt to have more experiences to draw upon, certainly.

> /David McClelland
> London, UK

Nick
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>