ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] AW: 6.1 experience so far

2009-12-14 15:38:20
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AW: 6.1 experience so far
From: Erwann Simon <erwann.simon AT FREE DOT FR>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:36:56 +0100
Stefan,

See this article in order to find tips to continue using the tsm operational reporting :
http://tsmblog.org/serendipity/index.php?/archives/129-Continue-to-use-TSM-Operational-Reporting-TOR-on-TSM-V6.html

--
Best regards / Cordialement / مع تحياتي
Erwann SIMON

Le 14/12/2009 09:08, Stefan Holzwarth a écrit :
What changes did you made to tsm operational reporting ?
In our environment most of the reports hang and gave no result.
Regards
Stefan Holzwarth


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] Im
Auftrag von Sam Sheppard
Gesendet: Samstag, 12. Dezember 2009 01:44
An: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Betreff: 6.1 experience so far

After viewing the experiences of others on the list (particularly Mr.
Forray's) and fearing I would jinx myself, I hesitated to
post this, but
decided to go ahead and post our adventures so far.

We had a visit from our Servergraph rep a couple of weeks ago
and during
the conversation discovered that we seemed to be alone, at least among
their Southern California customers, in implementing TSM Version 6 in
production.  We began in September and started with Version 6.1.2.  We
are approaching completion of our project to migrate our existing TSM
5.5.3 servers, two on z/OS and one on Solaris, to TSM Version
6 on a new
AIX 6.1 P-520 server.

Our total database size for the three existing servers is about 120GB.
We are sharing a 3494 ATL with 8 TS1120 drives between the Solaris box
and the Version 6 server, with the Version 6 server acting as the
library manager. So we may be somewhat on the small end of the average
customer.

Since we started on a fresh box, it looks like we have avoided many of
the pitfalls associated with upgrading in place from version 5, but we
did experience what in hindsight look like fairly minor problems:

     IC62978 - active logs fill up due to DB2 table reorg
processes. Fix
     was to specify the undocumented ALLOWTABLEREORG NO option.

     IC63373 - while running a large image backup (around 600GB) and
     several other clients, received message ANS1316e and ANR0526W,
     indicating recovery log out of space, even though we have 30GB and
     it's not even close to full. Solution is to do the following to
     change a DB2 variable from its standard setting:

       1. Use the following db2 command to determine the number of log
       volumes used:
          db2 get db cfg for TSMDB1
       2. Multiply the value for the LOGPRIMARY parameter by 90%.  This
       value should be reflected in NUM_LOG_SPAN.

       Update NUM_LOG_SPAN by issuing the following db2 command:
          db2 update db cfg for TSMDB1 using NUM_LOG_SPAN<newValue>
       You may need to restart the TSM server, which will restart the
       db2 database as well.

     IC63637 - We have a large (30-40TB) amount of archived
data to move
     from our existing server(s) to version 6. The good news
is that the
     large archived image backups exported server-to-server very fast,
     around 60MB/sec. The bad new is, the Version 6 library manager
     function periodically reclaims a tape drive being used by the
     library client, in our case, causing the large
EXPORT/IMPORT process
     being run to fail and mark the file being exported at the
time to be
     flagged, causing a copy pool tape to be requested if the
process is
     restarted. The fix for this was to install version
6.1.2.1 and then
     replace the DSMSERV module with a fix version.

     Database backups suddenly failed for 5 days in a row, but then
     started working again when support requested various
documentation.
     Looks like DB2 communicates with the TSM server with its own OPT
     file, specifying 'localhost' as the TCPSERVERADDRESS,
which appeared
     to be failing even though all other functions in the TSM
server were
     working fine. Waiting for reoccurence.

     Export Node function apparently does not copy the
MAXNUMMP setting.

     A (relatively) long list of quirks in the ISC, which we forced
     ourselves to use while our Servergraph license was updated. Some
     of these were only related to Firefox 3.5.4. The worst was a Java
     problem that 'unchecked' the 3 'enable sessions' boxes in the
     'Sessions' display of the Server Properties window when
you left the
     display and then came back, causing all sessions to be disabled
     necessitating a server restart. Using IE, however, the ISC has
     become almost bearable and performs much better than previous
     versions.

     The Operational Reporter is not officially supported in Version 6,
     something we missed, but is easily modified to supply most of the
     info needed.

We have not seen the dreaded huge increase in database size and after
the setting of the ALLOWREORGTABLE option, we haven't had any log
problems either. We are currently running full database backups on
Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, with incrementals in between. Full DB
backup of the 45GB database takes about 6 minutes to a TS1120 drive.
As noted, the current size of our DB is around 45GB with about 2/3 of
our 350 client having been moved. However, the largest of
them, several
Windows file/print servers containing in the neighborhood of
40 million
files, are still to be moved. We begin testing next week on an NDMP
solution for these, or perhaps experiment with the new
SnapDiff feature.

Sam Sheppard
San Diego Data Processing Corp.
(858)-581-9668


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>