ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers

2009-11-17 10:54:12
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:50:18 -0500
I may have to open a ticket with IBM.  My symptoms and number of incidents
is increasing as more folks install 6.1.2.0.

I can't believe they didn't catch and fix the GUI issue ("connection
severed")  in 6.1.2.0 .  I have been experimenting with my XP desktop and
found this issue goes back to 6.1.0.0.

Plus the issue of the GUI client being so stupid as to crash/hang with
strange "connection" problems/messages for something as simple as the word
"QUIET" being misspelled in the dsm.opt (found it by running the dsmc CLI
which gave the proper error)

I understand trying to be on one codebase for all platforms, but so far
JAVA based V6.1 on Windoz has been very problematic and causing us lots of
heartburn to the point of having to downlevel clients to keep them
working!



From:
Grigori Solonovitch <G.Solonovitch AT BKME DOT COM>
To:
ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:
11/17/2009 02:19 AM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>



Hello Zoltan,

Have you tried to report this problem to IBM?

I have tested WEB Client from TSM Client 6.1.2 and found it working fine.

I have tested GUI interface as well and found it working fine, but you
right - there is next messages in activity log in case of normal exit from
GUI:


 Export table [ console ] for tsmsrv1.bkme.com at 2009-11-17 08:45:01
'q act se='11297''
Num.

DATE/TIME

MESSAGE

1

11/17/2009 08:39:18

ANR0406I Session 11297 started for node SMS-GATEWAY (WinNT) (Tcp/Ip
sms-gateway.kuwait.aub.net(2453)). (SESSION: 11297)

2

11/17/2009 08:39:20

ANR0480W Session 11297 for node SMS-GATEWAY (WinNT) terminated -
connection with client severed. (SESSION: 11297)

3

11/17/2009 08:40:22

ANR2017I Administrator TSMEXPLORER issued command: QUERY ACTLOG se=11297
(SESSION: 11307)

Siberia Software SL<http://www.s-iberia.com>



It is abnormal, but it does not create any problems.



We have tested disaster recovery (TSM Client 6.1.2.0 and TBMR 6.2.1) for
Windows 2003 R2. Windows and all applications, including Oracle instance,
have been recovered on other server without any problems.



In addition, after correction initial problem (upgrade TSM 6.1.0.2 to
6.1.2.0 is not working, complete reinstall - de-install --> reboot -->
install --> reboot -->configure - helps to fix problem) backups are
working fine.

So I think it will be better not to go back to 5.5.2, try to fix problems
on already upgraded servers. I hope we will have 6.1.3 in December (I saw
this information somewhere).



Good luck,



Grigori G. Solonovitch



Senior Technical Architect



Information Technology  Bank of Kuwait and Middle East
http://www.bkme.com



Phone: (+965) 2231-2274  Mobile: (+965) 99798073  E-Mail:
G.Solonovitch AT bkme DOT com



Please consider the environment before printing this Email





-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 6:20 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers



We are having too many issues with the V6.1 client on mostly Windoz

servers.



So, we are looking at dropping back to V5.5.2.3 (still don't see a 5.3

client), the pre-Java client, for those problem servers.



What is the impact of downleveling a client?



Is it going to force a complete backups?  What about the inactives?







From:

Grigori Solonovitch <G.Solonovitch AT BKME DOT COM>

To:

ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU

Date:

11/13/2009 01:30 PM

Subject:

Re: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers

Sent by:

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>







Hello Zoltan,

We have started upgrade process from 6.1.0.2 to 6.1.2.0. 5 or 6 servers

Win2003R2 have been upgraded already.

We faced similar problem on one of them. I have fixed it by: de-install

client --> reboot server --> install client  --> reboot server -->

configure client services by setup wizard (existing dsm.opt).

Ithink it is a little bit long process, but what to do?

Regards,

Grigori

________________________________________

From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan

Forray/AC/VCU [zforray AT VCU DOT EDU]

Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 8:19 PM

To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU

Subject: [ADSM-L] Problems with 6.1.2.0 on Windows servers



We started pushing out 6.1.2.0 since our security officer read about the

security vulnerabilitys in 6.1.x



Now we are starting to see rashes of problems on W2K3 (both regular and

R2) servers.  Yet we have plenty of servers that have upgraded with no

issues.



ALL of these servers were running just fine with 6.1.0.0 and older

versions of the client.



Most are manifesting as crashes in dsmagent and/or communications errors

(which I know from previous issues I have seen with 6.x, is often a "red

herring").



Yes, we have tried complete un/reinstalls,  completely deleted the

*:\program files\Tivoli\TSM\directory



No luck googling for the obvious (dsmagent cXMLiterator)



 Anyone seeing similar problems?



Excerpts from the various error logs:



dsmj.log

---------------

11/13/2009 09:23:11: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred

between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!!

*** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

11/13/2009 09:23:16: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred

between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!!

*** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

11/13/2009 09:24:47: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred

between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!!

*** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

11/13/2009 09:24:50: ANS2613S A communications protocol error occurred

between the web browser and the client.Could not get JDOM tree !!!

*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket

write error

*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket

write error

*** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

11/13/2009 09:27:24: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the

client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException:

Connection reset by peer: socket write error

*** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

11/13/2009 11:30:25: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the

client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException:

Connection reset by peer: socket write error

*** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

11/13/2009 11:42:30: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the

client and the server machine.*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException:

Connection reset by peer: socket write error

*** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket

write error

*** commFlush: java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket

write error

*** commOpen: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

11/13/2009 11:45:47: ANS2610S TCP/IP communications failure between the

client and the server machine.



dsmcrash.log

-----------------------

2009/11/13 11:43:03

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager

Version: 6.1.2.00

Build date:  Thu Oct 22 15:11:11 2009



dsmagent.exe caused exception C0000005 (EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION) at

001B:0053C4A4



Register dump:

EAX=00000013  EBX=00000000  ECX=00000000  EDX=009891BA  ESI=0471FBB8

EDI=78552B7E  EBP=009891CD  ESP=0471FA1C  EIP=0053C4A4  FLG=00010202

CS=001B   DS=0023  SS=0023  ES=0023   FS=003B  GS=0000



Crash dump successfully written to file 'D:\Program

Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmcrash.dmp'



Stack Trace:

001B:0053C4A4 (0x00393030 0x333A3531 0x32323A35 0x31003600) dsmagent.exe,

cXMLiterator::cXMLiterator()+1234948 bytes



tsmstats.ini

-------------------

[fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\c$]

maxPath=193

totalLocalFiles=30471

totalLocalDirs=3059

maxDirCount=5958

maxDirName=C:\I386

[fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\e$]

maxPath=68

totalLocalFiles=24

totalLocalDirs=10

maxDirCount=7

maxDirName=E:\8241623edffcba54df4fdc\amd64

[fileSystemStatistics.\\dominodc3\d$]

maxPath=92

totalLocalFiles=423

totalLocalDirs=45

maxDirCount=211

maxDirName=D:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\jvm50\jre\bin



dsm.opt

--------------

PASSWORDACCESS  GENERATE

TCPSERVERADDRESS        tsmlinux4.ucc.vcu.edu

SCHEDLOGR 30 D

ERRORLOGR 30 D

QUIET

TCPClientAddress        192.168.20.58



Please consider the environment before printing this Email.



"This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain

confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named

recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are

not the named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the

sender immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this

communication and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email

or its attachments due to viruses, any other defects, interception or

unauthorized modification. The information, views, opinions and comments

of this message are those of the individual and not necessarily endorsed

by BKME."

________________________________
"This email message and any attachments transmitted with it may contain
confidential and proprietary information, intended only for the named
recipient(s). If you have received this message in error, or if you are
not the named recipient(s), please delete this email after notifying the
sender immediately. BKME cannot guarantee the integrity of this
communication and accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email
or its attachments due to viruses, any other defects, interception or
unauthorized modification. The information, views, opinions and comments
of this message are those of the individual and not necessarily endorsed
by BKME."