Re: [ADSM-L] Which is the truth? Inconsistencies between Scheduler Log S

Glad to help.
We've seen problems in the summary table and in the client-statistics
reporting.
For Servergraph, we ended up using the accounting log to analyze client
sessions.
That has always been rock solid.

To use it:
SET ACCOUNTING ON, first;
do a backup or something;
then look for dsmaccnt.log in the ...tsm/server/bin directory, and write
scripts to parse it, per the documentation in the TSM Administrator's Guide
(or is it the Reference?)
(Or get Servergraph to do it for you.)

Lindsay Morris
Principal
TSMworks
Tel. 1-859-539-9900
lindsay AT tsmworks DOT com


On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Andrew Raibeck <storman AT us.ibm DOT com> 
wrote:

> Ah, this came in after I hit "send" on my second response on this thread,
> so you have already found what I indicated.
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Software Group
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
> Level 3 Team Lead
> Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/IBM@IBMUS
> Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
>
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
>
> http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
>
>
> The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> The command line is your friend.
> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 10/26/2009
> 11:15:58 AM:
>
> > [image removed]
> >
> > Re: Which is the truth? Inconsistencies between Scheduler Log
> > Summary and collected events - Solved
> >
> > TSM
> >
> > to:
> >
> > ADSM-L
> >
> > 10/26/2009 11:16 AM
> >
> > Sent by:
> >
> > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> >
> > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> >
> > Hi Lindsay
> >
> > First item sent: 10/17/2009 20:00:49
> > Last item sent: 10/18/2009 23:56:35
> > Elapsed processing time:           03:56:28
> >
> > In deed, there are two sessions in the log. I missed checking the fist
> and
> > the last item sent.
> > Scheduler Log Summary and collected events correspond perfectly.
> >
> > Sorry for the set up.
> >
> > and thank you
> >
> > Gernot
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Lindsay Morris <lindsay AT TSMWORKS DOT COM>
> > Gesendet von: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> > 26.10.2009 15:07
> > Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> >
> >         An:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> >         Kopie:
> >         Thema:  Re: Antwort: Re: Which is the truth? Inconsistencies
> > between Scheduler Log Summary and collected events
> >
> >
> > You would not be able to match up "Objects inspected" by scanning the
> log;
> > You SHOULD  be able to match up "objects backed up" and "objects
> expired";
> > The log numbers are larger than the client statistics, and that makes
> > sense if the log has a lot of sessions, say, over the course of a
> > week.
> > The client statistics are for one particular session only.
> >
> > I don't have time to look through your log, but are you quite sure it
> only
> > has the one session in it, that matches the statistics?
> > I bet it has many sessions, like David said.  Look at the dates in it.
> >
> >
> > Lindsay Morris
> > Principal
> > TSMworks
> > Tel. 1-859-539-9900
> > lindsay AT tsmworks DOT com
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:37 AM, TSM <tsm AT profi-ag DOT de> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > you are right:
> > >
> > > Client: this is Windows
> > > TSM Backup-Archive Client Version 5, Release 5, Level 2.2
> > >
> > > Server: this is AIX
> > > Session established with server TSM01: AIX-RS/6000
> > > Server Version 5, Release 5, Level 3.0
> > >
> > >
> > > the log file can be dowloaded from
> > >
> > > http://rapidshare.com/files/298151011/logWith1Session.zip.html
> MD5:
> > > B56F02BA5E6968A98B10BF4A24E1D8E0
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > > Gernot
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Andrew Raibeck <storman AT US.IBM DOT COM>
> > > Gesendet von: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> > > 26.10.2009 14:10
> > > Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> > >
> > >         An:     ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> > >        Kopie:
> > >        Thema:  Re: Which is the truth? Inconsistencies between
> Scheduler
> > > Log Summary and collected events
> > >
> > >
> > > I think we'd need to see your log file to truly validate the numbers.
> > You
> > > also don't mention what client version or platform this is.
> > >
> > > Andy Raibeck
> > > IBM Software Group
> > > Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
> > > Level 3 Team Lead
> > > Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Hartford/IBM@IBMUS
> > > Internet e-mail: storman AT us.ibm DOT com
> > >
> > > IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/
> > IBMTivoliStorageManager.html
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > > The command line is your friend.
> > > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> > >
> > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 
> > > 10/26/2009
> > > 08:15:05 AM:
> > >
> > > > [image removed]
> > > >
> > > > Which is the truth? Inconsistencies between Scheduler Log Summary
> > > > and collected events
> > > >
> > > > TSM
> > > >
> > > > to:
> > > >
> > > > ADSM-L
> > > >
> > > > 10/26/2009 08:16 AM
> > > >
> > > > Sent by:
> > > >
> > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU>
> > > >
> > > > Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > An incremental client schedule provided the following statistics:
> > > >
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of objects inspected: 3,096,554
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of objects backed up:    4,856
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of objects updated:          0
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of objects rebound:          0
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of objects deleted:          0
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of objects expired:     27,290
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of objects failed:           6
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of subfile objects:          0
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Total number of bytes transferred:    5.43 GB
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Data transfer time:                  262.70 sec
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Network data transfer rate:        21,698.41
> > KB/sec
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Aggregate data transfer rate:        401.75
> KB/sec
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Objects compressed by:                    0%
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Subfile objects reduced by:               0%
> > > > 10/18/2009 23:56:38 Elapsed processing time:           03:56:28
> > > >
> > > > A deeper look into the scheduler log (68496 lines) shows different
> > > > results:
> > > >
> > > >  # grep Retry log | grep Directory--   | wc -l      206
> > > >  # grep Retry log | grep "Normal File" | wc -l      100
> > > >  # grep Retry log | grep Expiring      | wc -l       87
> > > >
> > > >  # grep -v Retry log | grep Directory--   | wc -l  7613
> > > >  # grep -v Retry log | grep "Normal File" | wc -l 12472
> > > >  # grep -v Retry log | grep Expiring--    | wc -l 47957
> > > >
> > > > I checked twice:
> > > > There is only one scheduler protocol in the file
> > > >
> > > > How do these figures fit together??
> > > >
> > > > Thank you
> > > >
> > > > Gernot
> > >
>
Re: [ADSM-L] Which is the truth? Inconsistencies between Scheduler Log Summary and collected events - Solved
