ADSM-L
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ADSM-L] devclass file vs devclass disk

2009-06-19 08:58:35
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] devclass file vs devclass disk
From: David Jelinek <David.Jelinek AT CMICH DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:53:50 -0400 
Sorry about that. I somehow forgot that copypools must be sequential.
The argument falls out after that. Sorry for bothering everyone with the
question. The only solution is increased bandwidth and more storage to
be flexible.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ADSM-L] File Device class question, Rodney Luk
Next by Date:  [ADSM-L] Problem with Mac TSM client and new Java, Button
Previous by Thread:  [ADSM-L] devclass file vs devclass disk, David Jelinek
Next by Thread:  [ADSM-L] Making sure clientactions start, Lee, Gary D.
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]