|
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform
2009-02-25 12:23:35
On Feb 25, 2009, at 18:17 , Thomas, Martin wrote:
I'd tend to agree but on Windows you have two "flavors" of 64bit.
"Real" 64 bit (Itanium, IA-64) and "emulated" (AMD's AMD64/x86-64 or
Intel's EMT64T:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64
Does someone have experience/metrics on both that we could compare?
Itanium is dead (or should be), at least there will be no Windows on
Itanium support in TSM 6.1
-- Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Mikael Lindstrom
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 11:53 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform
If you GO with Windows use 64bit
Prepared by IBM Attorney - IBM Confidential (Unless indicated
otherwise)
Såvida annat inte anges ovan: / Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM Svenska AB
Organisationsnummer: 556026-6883
Adress: 164 92 Stockholm
--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Remco Post
r.post AT plcs DOT nl
+31 6 248 21 622
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
|
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Howard Coles
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, km
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Schneider, John
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Jim Zajkowski
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Sergio Fuentes
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, De Gasperis, Mike
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Kelly Lipp
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Delroy Blake
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Allen S. Rout
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Huebner,Andy,FORT WORTH,IT
Re: [ADSM-L] Preferred TSM Platform, Kelly Lipp
|
|
|
