ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] AIX to RHEL command

2009-02-20 14:12:07
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AIX to RHEL command
From: "Clark, Robert A" <Robert.Clark AT PROVIDENCE DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:10:52 -0800
I need that last paragraph (with an attribution) on a t-shirt and a
poster. 

Thanks, [RC]
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 6:33 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] AIX to RHEL command

Just to try to clear this up:

There is nothing in Linux corresponding to the AIX Error Log.  The AIX
Error Log is a disciplined, architectural means for recording system
events, through /dev/error.  Entries in the log are rigorously
structured and readily reported in a uniform mannner, with event type,
time, and details.  This AIX facility is in addition to conventional
syslogging, for more mundane conditions.

Linux basically has just syslog, with /var/log/messages holding what
messages that system facilities choose to log, in arbitrary form (and
thus no uniform structured reporting capability inherent), with
timestamps (but no year included, which hampers historical review).
There is also the Kernel Ring Buffer, as reported by the dmesg command;
but this area usually contains little more than boot time messages
recorded by the kernel, with no timestamps.  In pursuing a problem, you
basically have just /var/log/messages, and it often lacks the kind of
information you need because participation is so arbitrary.

Linux is largely an undisciplined, free-for-all environment where
subsystems are contributed by creative individuals having disparate
views of how things should work and present information.  And anything
you become familiar with could wildly change or be wholly replaced by
something new in the next level.  Linux is a "challenge" for system
administrators and systems programmers due its philosophical nature
being such a departure from more rigorous, commercial versions of Unix.
Personally, coming from AIX I find systems programming in Linux to be
rather disappointing, and even exasperating, as exemplified by the
absence of a Process Table from which one could readily obtain
structured information, instead having to parse /proc "files" whose
content is textual and whose layout is defined by narrative rather than
structures.

   Richard Sims    http://people.bu.edu/rbs/


DISCLAIMER:
This message is intended for the sole use of the addressee, and may contain 
information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law. If you are not the addressee you are hereby notified that you 
may not use, copy, disclose, or distribute to anyone the message or any 
information contained in the message. If you have received this message in 
error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete this 
message.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>