Re: [ADSM-L] Backup of ownership and ACLs
2009-02-16 16:31:13
If all the ACLs are updated daily I guess thats not a problem, just
update them again after the restore :)
Or make a script that saves the ACLs before backup to a file and run as
a preschedulecmd.
Sounds like it could be worth it to avoid unnecessarily backing up 15 TB of
data every day.
-km
On 16/02, Mark Stapleton wrote:
> Perhaps. But what happens when you restore files without the latest ACLs?
> They're set for a reason, and to not restore the entire file's contents
> strikes me as rather worthless.
>
> --
> Mark Stapleton
> System engineer, CDW
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf
> Of Rolf Meyer
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 3:16 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup of ownership and ACLs
>
> Hello
>
> I think, there's an option called SKIPACLUPDATCHECK, which can be used
> to prevent incr backups just because of changing ACL-infos.
>
> Give it a try.
>
> Rolf Meyer
> Storage Consultant
> PROFI Engineering Systems AGAlexander Födisch schrieb:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > if we change the ownership (chmod/chgrp) or the ACLs of files/folders on
> > our GPFS-filesystem, all affected
> > data will be backed up again from TSM because the ctime was changed -
> > same behaviour on a XFS filesystem.
> > We often have to change recursively the ACLs of a 15TB-folder and so
> > this 15TB are backup up nearly daily...
> > I understand the necessity of backing up metadata as ownership or ACLs
> > :) But is there an other possibility?
> >
> > Can we backup just the metadata of changed files instead of all the
> > data? Depends this on the filesystem?
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.24/1954 - Release Date: 15-Feb-09
> 6:09 PM
|
|
|