Re: [ADSM-L] IBM TS3310 vs IBM TS3200
2008-10-22 06:14:08
We have a TS3200 on one off our smaller sites. Had issues where it
brought our DB2 database to a halt, because the operator tried to eject
more than 3 tapes at a time. The I/O station will not open to be able to
remove the tapes. All library operation freezes, hence my db2 log file
disk pool filled up and could not migrate to tape.
I also found the library (robotic part) quite "slow". Then again I'm
used to a 3584.
Regards,
Jacques van den Berg
TSM / Storage / SAP Basis Administrator
Pick 'n Pay IT
Email : jvandenberg AT pnp.co DOT za
Tel : +2721 - 658 1711
Fax : +2721 - 658 1676
Mobile : +2782 - 653 8164
Dis altyd lente in die hart van die mens wat God
en sy medemens liefhet (John Vianney).
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Larry Peifer
Sent: 22 October 2008 02:04 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] IBM TS3310 vs IBM TS3200
We are debating whether to purchase the IBM TS3310 or the TS3200 tape
library for use with our existing TSM environment. We are an AIX shop
running 4 Gig interfaces on a 4 Gig FC switch. This equipment will
replace
our existing IBM 3583 tape library. Any first hand experience would be
appreciated.
Read our disclaimer at: http://www.picknpay.co.za/pnp/view/pnp/en/page5093?
If you don't have web access, the disclaimer can be mailed to you on request.
Disclaimer requests to be sent to it-security AT pnp.co DOT za
|
|
|