ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] LTO Tape Life

2008-06-23 14:37:31
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO Tape Life
From: "Bell, Charles (Chip)" <Chip.Bell AT BHSALA DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:35:45 -0500
Well, if the information is simply not available, can someone point me to a
document saying so? Our brilliant auditors are requiring proof one way or
another in our DR documentation.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Wanda Prather
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 12:55 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] LTO Tape Life

I know, I just hate manual processes.

What I want is an API so that we can get that sort of info back to the host
in an automated fashion.
I want to be able to run something like:

audit volume * report(medialife)
or
audit volume * report=EXCEPTIONSONLY

(wouldn't that be cool?)


On 6/21/08, Richard Sims <rbs AT bu DOT edu> wrote:
>
> On Jun 21, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Wanda Prather wrote:
>
> The only way we're going to get this info, is if somebody provides
>> an API to
>> read from the cartridge chip.  I'm kinda suprised nobody has done
>> that yet
>> -- except as Tom says, the cartridges tend to last a long time anyway.
>>
>
> As noted in ADSM QuickFacts, see
>
>  www.mptapes.com
>
> and
>
>  http://www.mesa.nl/pub/tapeutil/
>
> There are probably other facilities out there as well.
>
>  Richard Sims
>

-----------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information and intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you received this information in error, please
notify the sender and delete this information from your computer
and retain no copies of any of this information.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>