ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] IBM p 520 vs. p 570

2008-06-16 18:21:19
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] IBM p 520 vs. p 570
From: "Nancy R. Brizuela" <Brizuela AT UWYO DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:21:14 -0600
I'm sorry--I forgot to add some additional information.  Our p-570 has
four 1.9GHz CPU's (Power 5+) vs. two 4.2 GHz CPU's (Power 6) for the
p-520.  

> _____________________________________________ 
> From:         Nancy R. Brizuela  
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 4:04 PM
> To:   ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject:      IBM p 520 vs. p 570
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> We are thinking of replacing our IBM p 570 with a p 520.  This server
> would be used exclusively for TSM backups.  We back up about 1.5 TB
> every night.  We have two tape libraries, one about 50 miles from here
> and one locally, where we send all the backup data (about 66 TB
> total).  We have 8 tape drives locally and 5 tape drives at the remote
> library.  Our database and storage pools are on our SAN.  
> 
> What do folks think about the p 570 performance vs. the p 520--better
> or worse?  Has anyone made this same switch or is anyone using a p
> 520?  If so, how are things going?  What's your environment look like?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Nancy Brizuela, CPA
> Systems Programmer, Senior
> University of Wyoming
> IBM/Unix Systems Group
> Ivinson Room 238
> (307)766-2958
> 
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>