ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Expire inventory.

2008-05-19 17:30:01
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Expire inventory.
From: "Schneider, Jim" <jschneider AT USSCO DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:29:02 -0500
Dave,

Yes.  I got this from IBM support.
expire inventory beginnode=<number> endnode=<number>

To get the node numbers, use the following case-sensitive commands.
>From a dsmadmc session:
create sqltable Nodes Mynodes
select c0,c1 from Mynodes order by c1
drop sqltable Mynodes

Cheers,
Jim Schneider

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
David Hensley
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 4:09 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Expire inventory.

Question needing answered please. Is there a way to expire old data in
your
tape copy pools from a particular node?



Dave Hensley
Technical Analyst
McNeilus Companies, Inc.
Desk: 1-507-374-8587
Cell: 1-507-244-0921


Although this e-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any
virus or other defect which might affect any computer system, it is the
responsibility of the recipient to check that it is virus-free and the
sender accepts no responsibility or liability for any loss, injury,
damage, cost or expense arising in any way from receipt or use thereof
by the recipient.

The information contained in this electronic mail message is
confidential information and intended only for the use of the individual
or entity named above, and may be privileged.  If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in error, please
contact the sender immediately, delete this material from your computer
and destroy all related paper media.  Please note that the documents
transmitted are not intended to be binding until a hard copy has been
manually signed by all parties.
Thank you.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>