ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] migration vs move data

2008-02-26 10:52:13
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] migration vs move data
From: Richard Rhodes <rrhodes AT FIRSTENERGYCORP DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:50:50 -0500
When I moved our primary pools from 3494/3590's to 3584/3592's,  I used
movedata.
I found the movedat was much easier to control the process.  I coded a
script that would vary
the number of movedata's running concurrently depending upon the number of
free/available tape drives.  During the day It would run 3-4 movedata's.
while during
thenight I had 6-8 running. Our problem was the pools were very big
(several thousand
3494/3590 tapes), and we wanted to migrate the data asap.  If your pools
are not
very big, the it's probably not worth the effort to take control via
movedata's.

Rick





             Keith Arbogast
             <warbogas@INDIANA
             .EDU>                                                      To
             Sent by: "ADSM:           ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
             Dist Stor                                                  cc
             Manager"
             <[email protected]                                     Subject
             .EDU>                     migration vs move data


             02/26/2008 10:17
             AM


             Please respond to
             "ADSM: Dist Stor
                 Manager"
             <[email protected]
                   .EDU>






What would be the consequential differences between using migration
versus using 'move data' to transfer backup files from one primary
tape pool to another? I see that with 'move data' I would specify
volumes names myself, whereas migration would pick the volumes to
move. Are there other differences that would favor one technique over
the other? A difference in throughput rate would be especially
interesting.

The files are moving between data centers, and are now in virtual
volumes. The target tape pool consists of physical 3592 cartridges.

This is all running on RHEL 4, TSM 5.4.0.3, over a 10 Gb network link.

Thank you,
Keith Arbogast
Indiana University


-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.