ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Fw: Manual backup vs. GUI after resolving ANS1063E

2008-01-16 16:56:14
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Fw: Manual backup vs. GUI after resolving ANS1063E
From: John Underdown <JohnUnderdown AT SYNOVUS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:54:44 -0500
Chip, 

every time i've had this issue it turned out to be different permissions 
between the user accounts running the backups. 

John

>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at  4:18 PM, in message 
>>> <D3C0BFE627E1C24486DCC6A08EFF3AA4069A90BB AT bhsmailm2.bhsala DOT com>, 
>>> "Bell, Charles (Chip)" <Chip.Bell AT BHSALA DOT COM> wrote:

No, I always verified that missing drive was picked up. I'm confused...

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of 
Sung
Y Lee
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 3:03 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Fw: Manual backup vs. GUI after resolving ANS1063E

Is it possible that when manual backups were taken in interim , it always
missed that drive similar to TSM schedule unable to backup.

If this is not the case,

the file is eligible for backup if any of the following changed.  See if
any of the following changed.
Last modified
File size
File owner
File permission


Sung Y. Lee
----- Forwarded by Sung Y Lee/Austin/IBM on 01/16/2008 03:46 PM -----

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 01/16/2008
03:27:19 PM:

> In the process of resolving ANS1063E for a couple of clients, I noted
> something that seemed strange. There was one machine in particular, that
I've
> been running manually, and it would back up a few 100 MB at a time. It
was
> finally able to run a scheduled backup of the drive that it had been
unable
> to do, and it has so far backed up 10+ GB. This may be an elementary TSM
> question, but why is there a discrepancy between the manual incremental
> backups I had been doing in the interim, and the scheduled backup that is
> running now?
>
>
>
> God bless you!!!
>
> Chip Bell
> Network Engineer I
> IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional
> Baptist Health System
> Birmingham, AL
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Confidentiality Notice:
> The information contained in this email message is privileged and
> confidential information and intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this information is strictly
> prohibited. If you received this information in error, please
> notify the sender and delete this information from your computer
> and retain no copies of any of this information.



-----------------------------------------
NOTICE: This communication is intended only for the person or
entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential,
proprietary, and/or privileged material. Unless you are the
intended addressee, any review, reliance, dissemination,
distribution, copying or use whatsoever of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please reply
immediately and delete the material from all computers. Email sent
through the Internet is not secure. Do not use email to send us
confidential information such as credit card numbers, PIN numbers,
passwords, Social Security Numbers, Account numbers, or other
important and confidential information.