ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Solaris10 and ZFS filesystems

2007-10-15 11:14:09
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Solaris10 and ZFS filesystems
From: Fred Johanson <Fred AT UCHICAGO DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:13:45 -0500
The only one of my users to try zfs so far reports that she can only get
backups from an executed script.  She hasn't got the scheduler to work.
Her client is 5.4.1.2

Fred Johanson
TSM Administrator
University of Chicago

773-702-8464


-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Rejean Larivee
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 3:33 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Solaris10 and ZFS filesystems

Hello,
you need to upgrade your client from 5.4.0.0 to 5.4.1.2, where support
for
the zfs file
system for the Backup/Archive client was added. The zfs file systems
should
be
picked up by the scheduled backup at that level. There are some
limitations
to the support
of the zfs file system and those are in the process of being documented
on
our
support pages.

Have a great weekend !

Rejean Larivee
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support
IBM Global Technology Services

************************************************************************
**********************************

Visit our new IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support page:
http://www-3.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageM
anager.html


Expand IBM Tivoli product knowledge through our Support Technical
Exchange.

http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/supp_tech_exch.
html

************************************************************************
**********************************

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 10/12/2007
04:56:59 PM:

> TSM server 5.3.4 0 on AIX
> Client 5.4.0.0 on Solaris 10
>
> The TSM client on Solaris appears to ignore the zfs filesystems during
> scheduled backup.  Non-ZFS filesystems back up OK, zfs filesystems can
be
> backed up manually.
>
> Any idea whether this relates to a permissions thing or if TSM treats
them
> like NFS mounts?
>
> Any hints?
>
> Thanks
> Wanda