ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Dual interface TSM server

2007-06-27 09:39:29
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Dual interface TSM server
From: Andy Huebner <Andy.Huebner AT ALCONLABS DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:37:43 -0500
I would use round robin DNS, put both addresses in DNS and let the luck
of the draw spread the load.
One problem you may have is you can only have one default gateway.  All
traffic outbound for a different network, as defined by your subnet
mask, will use only on NIC.  Should that NIC fail you may have to
restart something, NIC or OS, to move the default gateway.
Without Etherchannel or something similar, I do believe a human will be
needed if the primary NIC drops off the network.  Do you trust all of
the humans there at 2am, which is the only time NICs are designed to
fail?

Andy Huebner
P.S. The preceding is based on using two NICs on Windows systems.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Rhodes
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:11 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Dual interface TSM server

I'm no expert in networking, but  I do know that you have to be careful
with multiple
interfaces in that that they may not work as you expect.

For example . . . are the client nodes on the same network as the TSM
server?  By
"network", I mean the network part of the ip address.  If they are not
(ie:
their
traffic gets to TSM via a router), then you can get inbound traffic to
the
TSM server
arriving on one nic and outbound traffic from the TSM server on the nic
assigned
to the default route.

Rick

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 06/26/2007
06:14:32 PM:

> AFAIK yes ... just point your TCPSERVERADDRESS to working IP address,
> it should work /me thinks ...
>
> On 6/26/07, Daad Ali <daad_l AT yahoo DOT ca> wrote:
> > Hi ALL,
> >
> >   I have a server that has two interfaces configured (Two IP
addresses
as well).
> >
> >   Without using EtherChannel or any redunancy like that, is there a
way
to tell the client to use the 2nd interface incase the first one fails.
> >


-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.


This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. If you are not an intended recipient or an authorized 
representative of an intended recipient, you are prohibited from using, copying 
or distributing the information in this e-mail or its attachments. If you have 
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail and delete all copies of this message and any attachments.
Thank you.