ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation by group

2007-06-22 15:56:59
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation by group
From: Richard Mochnaczewski <Richard.Mochnaczewski AT STANDARDLIFE DOT CA>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:55:55 -0400
No problem. Everyone has a different take on how things get done. Sometimes. 
there is no one way to do something in TSM.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Nick Laflamme
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 3:49 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Collocation by group


I misread your note, and I apologize. What I wrote made sense if you
were asking about a node that was already known to TSM but hadn't been
in the collocated pool before you added it to the collocation group. But
you're describing a situation with a new node to TSM, and my answer
makes no sense on that context. I apologize for the resulting confusion.

Nick


Richard Mochnaczewski wrote:
> Actually, on my tape pools I had to enable collocate by group instead of node.
>
> I don't see the point in doing a move nodedata. Why would I want to collocate 
> all my data on that node ? If I run a selective on all filesystems, I would 
> have a full image of what the syestem looked like today. If I had a DR 
> situation in a week , then
> I know that most of my data is mostly on one tape. If I do a move nodedata 
> and move all the data, I would have a lot more tapes to deal with. I would 
> rather let retnetion/expiration come into play and drop the older files and 
> keep my collocation "clean".
>
> Rich

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>