This is what I got from my vendor on the subject. Also, your current
licenses will be converted to units. Similar to what happened when TSM
went from its old model of licensing to the processor based licenses. 
The one thing I find interesting is that they go by 100s of units which
seems to leave it open for single digit unit charges, possibly for
virtuals or partitioning. Speculation on my part I guess.

Here is a link to IBM's description of the Tivoli Enhanced Value-Based
Pricing:
http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIX.wss?DocURL=http://d03xhttpcl001g.b
oulder.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/2/877/ENUSZP07-0102/index.html&InfoType
=AN&InfoSubType=CA&InfoDesc=Announcement+Letters&panelurl=OIX.wss%3Fbutt
onpressed%3DNAV002PT090&paneltext=Announcement+letter+search#Header_41

He doesn't think it is going to have much effect on your pSeries TSM
licenses, and could save you a few dollars on quad-core systems.  They
refer to licensing for physical partitions, but that is for older IBM SP
systems, some Sun systems, and HP Superdomes.  pSeries are logically
paritioned, so it does not apply. 
 
For p4 systems:
    Dual Core systems     Value Units = 100 x # of cores
 
For p5 Systems:
    Dual Core systems     Value Units = 100 x # of cores
    Quad Core systems    Value Units = 50 x # of cores
 
For BladeCenter PowerPC
    Single Core systems    Value Units = 100 x # of cores
    Dual Core systems      V alue Units = 50 x # of cores
 
For BladeCenter Operton
    Single Core systems                Value Units = 100 x # of cores
    Dual or Quad Core systems      Value Units = 50 x # of cores
 
  
For BladeCenter Xeon or Pentium
    Single Core systems                Value Units = 100 x # of cores
    Dual or Quad Core systems      Value Units = 50 x # of cores
 
System x same as BladeCenter

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 2:29 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4

Ok, this will be my last. Having never seen what we were paying for
licences you can obviously come to the conclusion you have. I can't and
won't post that info but I have data to prove it. I can tell you that
IBM has been drooling waiting for our contract to expire I'm sure. The
past year has seen some interesting things IBM has tried to do here.
Can't get into detail so let's just say there has been a lot of angry
people. So when I say that our costs have gone up that's an
understatement. 
 
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: geoffrey.l.gill AT saic DOT com 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-adsm-l AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU [mailto:owner-adsm-l AT VM.MARIST DOT 
EDU] On
Behalf Of Remco Post
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 12:30 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4

Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
> Just "one" of my pet peves with this product. I just went through this

> with someone and it looks to me like the changes that were made since 
> the last time have dramatically increased the cost here. Having to 
> contact someone to figure out pricing makes no sense when you can find

> pricing for most anything else you want on the internet. Oh sure, I 
> would expect that you need to contact someone to get "better pricing"
> before you buy, but to not have a way to at least figure out something

> on your own is unsatisfactory to me.
>


The only change I've seen is that multi-core CPU's are actually cheaper
that in the old model (100 points for 2 x86 cores rather than 2
lisences, even better for UltraSPARC T1), so how you manage to increase
cost beats me. Since 100 points are (more or less) the same as 1
license, I expect to pay less, not more.

Since IBM has some interesting volume discounts, nobody ever pays
list-prices. Of course we all know or discount... I estemate investments
in new licenses on the cost for last year, not to hard. And yes, I only
buy new licenses once a year, doing so more often is a PITA ;-)

>
>
> Geoff Gill
> TSM Administrator
> PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
> SAIC M/S-G1b
> (858)826-4062
> Email: geoffrey.l.gill AT saic DOT com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-adsm-l AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU [mailto:owner-adsm-l AT VM.MARIST DOT 
> EDU]
> On Behalf Of David Longo
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:23 PM
> To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: Pricing model for 5.4
>
> I second the motion, Steve!
>
> TSM should be able to track/mange the license scheme.
> Or they should provide an additional tool to do it - without charging 
> you $100K for the tool!
>
>
>
> David B. Longo
> System Administrator
> Health First, Inc.
> 3300 Fiske Blvd.
> Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
> PH      321.434.5536
> Pager  321.634.8230
> Fax:    321.434.5509
> david.longo AT health-first DOT org
>
>
>>>> Steven Harris <steve AT STEVENHARRIS DOT INFO> 2/6/2007 7:11 PM >>>
> Hi All,
>
> I was looking at the TSM 5.4 announcement letter and notice that 5.4 
> now attracts "Processor Value Unit" pricing.  The (AP) announcement 
> letter points you to the PVU announcement letter AP06-0154, which 
> contains a lot of justification and not much else.  It in turn points 
> you to a website for detailed information - but this is just the 
> passport advantage portal.
>
> I have a few concerns.
> First, PVU pricing may mean an effective price rise, although it is 
> hard to tell without detailed information. Certainly its a change.
> Second, why is it so hard to find definitive information? This should 
> be widely published on a publicly available website.
> Third, yet again the administrative burden of tracking licencing 
> requires detailed hardware information to be maintained and correlated

> with the TSM usage.  Again, the product has not been enhanced to 
> automatically collect and maintain  this information, providing a 
> significant overhead for administrators and a lack of assurance that
> licencing is *ever* correct.   Sure IBM has the right to change their
> licencing model, but they should also provide tools to do the job 
> efficiently and effectively and provide an audit function to allow 
> customers to know they are correctly licensed.
>
> If anyone has been able to find the PVU detail could they please post 
> it for those of us who don't have access to Passport Advantage?
>
> Thanks
>
> Steve.
>
> Steven Harris
> AIX and TSM Admin, Brisbane Australia


--
Met vriendelijke groeten,

Remco Post

SARA - Reken- en Netwerkdiensten                      http://www.sara.nl
High Performance Computing  Tel. +31 20 592 3000    Fax. +31 20 668 3167
PGP Key fingerprint = 6367 DFE9 5CBC 0737 7D16  B3F6 048A 02BF DC93 94EC

"I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the
computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the
computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to
end." -- Douglas Adams