Re: Collocation groups and offsite reclamation

Subject:	Re: Collocation groups and offsite reclamation
From:	"Allen S. Rout" <asr AT UFL DOT EDU>
To:	ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date:	Thu, 14 Dec 2006 09:28:19 -0500

>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 13:55:51 -0500, Thomas Denier <Thomas.Denier AT 
>> JEFFERSONHOSPITAL DOT ORG> said:

> My site once had a primary tape pool and a copy tape pool used for
> some of our larger clients, with both of these pools collocated by
> node. Offsite reclamation was a painful experience.


Can you describe your config in slightly greater detail?  You say
'offsite reclamation', but I'm not clear where the offsite happened;
if the copy pool was offsite, that's one thing.  If the offsite pool
was yet-another pool, that's different.

- Allen S. Rout

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: ANR999D shmcomm.c(1826) error, Joni Moyer

Next by Date:

Re: Collocation groups and offsite reclamation, Thomas Denier

Previous by Thread:

Collocation groups and offsite reclamation, Thomas Denier

Next by Thread:

Re: Collocation groups and offsite reclamation, Thomas Denier

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]