Hi....

Tnx's for information.  So what size should a standalone server (VmWare
server slice) be??  Based upon the below comment (resource hog), i.e.
1-1.4GHZ proc minimum and 1GB memory minimum is not enough, what size
should it be?? 

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Doug Fox
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2006 5:12 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM Admin Console on VmWare server

Depending on your hardware setup for the VMWare environment that could
be
very beneficial. Seperating the new admin console is a big plus since in
my
experience, it has been a resource hog. You actually have me interested
in
trying the same thing. I think I'll be asking our guys to do the same.




On 11/9/06, Lamb, Charles P. <cplamb AT nppd DOT com> wrote:
>
> Hi.......
>
>
>
> We are looking at upgrading our TSM V5.2 software package to V5.3
which
> is currently on an IBM RISC (IBM 7026-H80, 16GB of memory, 6-750MHZ
> proc, IBM 3584-L32/D32 Library with 14-LTO2 FC drives, 2TB of changed
> data per day, 35TB data on-site and 35TB data off-site, 200 servers -
> RISC & Intel).  We are looking at installing the TSM Admin console on
an
> Intel VmWare server per our Intel team and leaving the other parts of
> TSM on the IBM RISC server.  Anyone have any experience on this VmWare
> type of installation?  Any pro's or con's on this VmWare type of
> installation?  Any operational concerns considering this type of TSM
> installation which the group could address??  Is the EOSL on TSM V5.2
to
> be April 30, 2007??
>
>
>
> Tnx's a bunch for your input>>>>>>>>
>