ADSM-L

Re: Determining archive sizes for recharge?

2006-08-04 13:50:21
Subject: Re: Determining archive sizes for recharge?
From: "Prather, Wanda" <Wanda.Prather AT JHUAPL DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:49:12 -0400
I've never done this, so you'll have to test it for yourself to see how
practical these suggestions are:

1) If the machine is a UNIX variant, and you specify VIRTUALMOUNTPOINT
for each of the users' directories, doesn't TSM store it as though it is
a separate filespace?  Then does Q OCC filespacename give you what you
want?  

2) If that doesn't work, consider just giving each user a script that
invokes archiving using an options file with his own NODENAME.  Allow OS
backups to run under the host NODENAME as usual, but force archives to
be stored under separate NODENAMEs.  Then for sure you can get the
amount of GB that person has backed up.  

Wanda Prather
"I/O, I/O, It's all about I/O"  -(me)


  

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU] On Behalf Of
Jim Zajkowski
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 11:17 AM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Determining archive sizes for recharge?

Hi folks,

Right now we only backup servers to TSM.  We are considering allowing
individuals to use TSM as an archive repository, and the first question
that came up was how to figure out how much space a particular client or
person is using in the archive, so we can send them a bill.

The caveat: one of the machines that people will archive from is used by
more than one billable group (specifically, more than one research lab).
I will need to be able to figure out which person has archived however
much they did.  While the idea of having more than one management class
with different tape pools seems like a sound idea, I cannot necessarily
rely on the users choosing the right class.  Each user's directory has
their name on it, so we can probably figure it out from a q arch on the
client.

Has anyone done this?  I know how much we all love recharging, but that
is
out of my control.

Thanks!

--Jim

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>