ADSM-L

Re: Reclamation processing behavior

2006-07-25 18:09:51
Subject: Re: Reclamation processing behavior
From: "Thorneycroft, Doug" <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:08:50 -0700
They should both appear as ATL's to Tivoli. The real tape is a
Qualstar, with AIT Drives and Media, and the VTL appears as a Quantum,
With DLT Drives and media. And Both are defined as primary sequential
storage pools. I would expect the behavior to be the same.

-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:59 PM
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Subject: Re: Reclamation processing behavior


>>This really isn't a problem, but I was just curious if anyone knows why Tivol 
>>treats the two types of storage
pools differently.
 
>From TSM's point of view, why do you think they are 2 different "types" of 
>storage pools?  Aren't they both sequential tape devices, from the TSm 
>server's point of view?
 
Wanda

Doug Thorneycroft
> Systems Analyst
> County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County
> 1955 Workman Mill Road
> Whittier, CA 90601
> Tel: (562)699-7411, Ext. 1058
> Fax:(562)695-6756
> www.lacsd.org
>
>
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>