ADSM-L

Re: 'show alloc' +5.3.2.x

2006-02-08 12:54:16
Subject: Re: 'show alloc' +5.3.2.x
From: Mark Stapleton <mark.stapleton AT USBANK DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:54:08 -0600
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU> wrote on 02/08/2006 
09:00:37 AM:
> If I do a 'show alloc' on a Solaris 8/9 5.3.2.0 or on an AIX 5.3.2.1
> I get some output:
> tsm: TSM01>show alloc
>     pkmon.c line   636:        1 entries for            48 bytes
>     pkmon.c line   933:        1 entries for         14400 bytes
>     pkmon.c line   996:      269 entries for       8736000 bytes
>   outinit.c line   328:        1 entries for            96 bytes
> 
> But, if I do the same on a Win2k, 5.3.2.1 or a Win2k3, 5.3.2.0 I 
getnothing?!?
> tsm: TSM02>show alloc
> 
> tsm: TSM02>
> 
> 
> Anyone who knows why show alloc doesn´t work?

There is a tendency among TSM administrators to forget that SHOW commands 
are undocumented, unsupported, and (in a few cases) downright dangerous to 
use in a production system. Don't expect a definitive answer. I suspect 
(and this is a WAG) that the SHOW ALLOC command points at something that 
is *NIX-specific.

--
Mark Stapleton (mark.stapleton AT usbank DOT com)
MR Backup and Recovery Management
262.790.3190

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains 
information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy 
laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from 
retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this 
information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have 
received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you 
in advance for your cooperation.
==============================================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>